Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Philwold Estates, Inc.
418 N.E.2d 1310, 437 N.Y.S.2d 291, 52 N.Y.2d 253 (1981)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A court may extinguish a restrictive covenant under NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law § 1951 when changed circumstances make the covenant's purpose impossible, rendering the burdened land useless, provided the covenant is of no actual and substantial benefit to the party seeking enforcement.
Facts:
- In 1923, William Bradford sold a parcel of land on the Neversink River to Alfred J. Crane, while retaining adjacent land for himself.
- The deed for the sold parcel included a restrictive covenant limiting its use solely to the construction and operation of a hydroelectric power plant and related structures.
- Bradford also reserved for himself exclusive hunting and fishing rights over the parcel sold to Crane.
- Plaintiffs Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. and its subsidiary eventually acquired the restricted parcel from Crane's successor.
- Defendant Wechsler eventually acquired Bradford's retained, adjacent land, along with the hunting and fishing rights.
- In 1940, the City of New York condemned all of the plaintiffs' riparian (water) rights associated with the restricted parcel, making it impossible to build or operate a hydroelectric plant.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiffs Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. and Clove Development Corporation sued defendant Wechsler in a New York trial court (Special Term).
- The plaintiffs sought a judgment to either declare the restrictive covenant unenforceable or have it extinguished.
- The trial court dismissed the action, ruling it was barred by the statute of limitations.
- Plaintiffs appealed to the intermediate appellate court (the Appellate Division).
- The Appellate Division reversed the trial court's dismissal, held that the covenant ran with the land, but ordered it extinguished under NY RPAPL § 1951. However, it reserved the right for Wechsler to seek future damages.
- The case was then appealed to the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, for review of the Appellate Division's order.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Under NY Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law § 1951, does a restrictive covenant limiting land use solely to hydroelectric purposes warrant extinguishment when government condemnation of water rights has made that use impossible, rendering the land useless?
Opinions:
Majority - Meyer, J.
Yes. The restrictive covenant warrants extinguishment because it renders the land wholly useless under present circumstances. Although the covenant runs with the land, NY RPAPL § 1951 permits a court to extinguish a restriction if, due to changed conditions, its purpose is not capable of accomplishment and it is of no actual and substantial benefit to the person seeking enforcement. Here, the city's condemnation of water rights made the sole permitted use—a hydroelectric plant—impossible. This complete frustration of purpose, which renders the plaintiffs' land valueless while still subject to taxes, heavily outweighs the non-quantifiable, aesthetic benefit defendant Wechsler claims from keeping the adjacent land unspoiled. Therefore, balancing the equities, the covenant confers no 'actual and substantial benefit' on Wechsler sufficient to justify the severe burden on the plaintiffs' land.
Analysis:
This case provides a key interpretation of NY RPAPL § 1951, demonstrating the judiciary's power to extinguish obsolete restrictive covenants to promote the productive use of land. It establishes that even if a covenant holder derives some benefit, that benefit must be 'actual and substantial' when weighed against a burden that renders the servient estate completely useless. The decision signals that courts will apply a balancing of hardships test, prioritizing marketability and utilization of land over the enforcement of restrictions whose original purposes have been completely frustrated by external events.
