Lexplug logoLexplug

ORANGE COUNTY INDUS. DEVELOP. AUTH. v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
427 So.2d 174 (1983)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

For a private project to qualify for industrial development revenue bond financing under Florida law, it must either be an "industrial or manufacturing plant" as defined by statute, or it must serve a paramount public purpose where any private benefit is purely incidental.


Facts:

  • The Outlet Company, which owns and operates WCPX-TV, a commercial television station in Orlando, requested $9,000,000 in industrial development revenue bonds from the Orange County Industrial Development Authority.
  • The funds were intended to finance the purchase of land and the construction of a new 45,000 square foot facility for broadcast studios and offices, as well as the acquisition of new equipment.
  • The project was an expansion of an existing business that had operated in the area for many years.
  • WCPX executives anticipated that the project would create a minimum of 25 new jobs, increasing employment from 110 to 135 persons.
  • The station claimed the expansion was necessary because its current facility size caused it to turn away profitable commercial production business.
  • The station also asserted that the new facilities would enable it to increase local news services and the production of public service announcements.

Procedural Posture:

  • The Orange County Industrial Development Authority filed a petition in the circuit court to validate $9,000,000 of industrial development revenue bonds.
  • The circuit court (trial court) found that the proposed television station project did not qualify as an industrial or manufacturing plant and did not serve a paramount public purpose.
  • The trial court entered a judgment denying the petition for validation.
  • The Orange County Industrial Development Authority, as appellant, brought a direct appeal of the trial court's judgment to the Supreme Court of Florida.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does the issuance of industrial development revenue bonds to finance the expansion of a commercial television station qualify as a project for an 'industrial or manufacturing plant' under Chapter 159 of the Florida Statutes, or alternatively, serve a 'paramount public purpose' under the Florida Constitution?


Opinions:

Majority - Ehrlich, J.

No. The issuance of industrial development revenue bonds for a commercial television station is not permissible because a television station is neither an 'industrial or manufacturing plant' under the statute nor does it serve a 'paramount public purpose.' First, a television station does not fall within the plain language or enumerated examples of an 'industrial or manufacturing plant' in Chapter 159. Expanding the definition to include a commercial broadcast facility would be an unreasonable construction of the statute, as it would effectively allow any business to qualify for this type of financing. Second, the project does not meet the paramount public purpose test. The primary beneficiary of the financing is the private Outlet Company, which would save approximately $300,000 annually. The public benefits—such as a minimal increase in employment and potentially more informed citizenry—are incidental and insufficient to override the project's paramount private purpose. A broad, general public purpose is not enough to sustain a project that, in its direct and actual use, is a purely private enterprise.


Dissenting - Alderman, C.J.

Yes. The bond issuance should be validated because the project both qualifies as an 'industrial plant' and serves a paramount public purpose. The term 'industrial plant' should be liberally construed, as mandated by the statute, and the local authority's determination that the project qualifies should be given deference. A broadcasting station is a branch of business that produces a product and employs significant capital and personnel, analogous to other facilities this Court has previously approved. Furthermore, the project serves a paramount public purpose by creating jobs, enhancing the local economy, and, most importantly, producing a more informed citizenry, which is a core goal of the First Amendment. The Federal Communications Commission license itself is a determination that the station serves the public interest. Any private benefit to the station's owners is merely incidental to this essential public service.



Analysis:

This decision significantly narrows the scope of projects eligible for industrial development revenue bond financing in Florida. The court established a clear, two-step analytical framework: a project must first be tested against the statutory definition of an 'industrial or manufacturing plant,' and if it fails, it must then pass the much stricter, common-law 'paramount public purpose' test. The ruling signals the court's refusal to equate general economic development, such as minor job creation or commercial expansion, with a paramount public purpose. This precedent makes it more difficult for service-based or commercial enterprises to obtain this form of public financing, reserving it for traditional industrial facilities or projects with a direct and overwhelming public benefit.

G

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: ORANGE COUNTY INDUS. DEVELOP. AUTH. v. State (1983)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"