Ogletree v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
500 S.E.2d 570, 269 Ga. 443 (1998)
Rule of Law:
In Georgia, the 'open and obvious danger' rule is not controlling in product design defect cases, as it is inconsistent with the risk-utility analysis which considers the obviousness of a danger as only one of many factors.
Facts:
- Navistar International Transportation Corporation's predecessor manufactured the cab and chassis of a fertilizer spreader truck.
- The owner of the fertilizer spreader truck backed it over Mrs. Jackie Ogletree’s husband.
- Mrs. Ogletree’s husband died as a result of being backed over by the truck.
- Mrs. Ogletree alleged that Navistar had a duty to install an audible back-up alarm on the vehicle.
Procedural Posture:
- Mrs. Ogletree brought a wrongful death action against Navistar in a trial court.
- A jury verdict awarded Mrs. Ogletree funeral and medical expenses only.
- Mrs. Ogletree moved for a new trial on the issue of damages, and Navistar moved for judgment n.o.v. or, in the alternative, for a new trial.
- The trial court denied both motions for a new trial, but granted Navistar’s motion for judgment n.o.v.
- Mrs. Ogletree appealed the trial court's ruling to the Court of Appeals of Georgia (227 Ga. App. 11), where Mrs. Ogletree was the appellant and Navistar was the appellee.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s grant of Navistar’s motion for judgment n.o.v., applying the “open and obvious danger” rule.
- The Supreme Court of Georgia granted certiorari to consider the viability of the “open and obvious danger” rule in light of Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the 'open and obvious danger' rule remain viable in Georgia for determining liability in product design defect cases after Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc.?
Opinions:
Majority - Carley, Justice.
No, the 'open and obvious danger' rule is not controlling in product design defect cases in Georgia, as it is inconsistent with the risk-utility analysis adopted in Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc. The Court explained that under the obvious danger rule, the patent absence of a safety device is dispositive, precluding manufacturer liability. However, Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc. adopted a risk-utility analysis for determining design defects, which considers the degree to which a danger is open and obvious as merely one factor among many, not as a conclusive bar to liability. This approach implicitly rejected the obvious danger rule, aligning Georgia with the overwhelming majority of other jurisdictions and the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability, which also reject or criticize the rule. The Court reasoned that total reliance on the obviousness of a danger diverts focus from whether a product could have been designed safer at little expense, thereby encouraging manufacturers to produce dangerous products. Thus, making the open and obvious nature of a danger a dispositive factor is inconsistent with the Banks mandate to weigh a product's risk against its utility, applying negligence principles to strict liability. The Court explicitly overruled Weatherby v. Honda Motor Co. and any other inconsistent appellate decisions.
Analysis:
This decision significantly redefines product liability law in Georgia for design defect claims, moving the state away from a strict 'open and obvious danger' defense for manufacturers. It solidifies the risk-utility test from Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc. as the comprehensive framework for evaluating design defects, bringing Georgia in line with most other jurisdictions. Manufacturers can no longer rely solely on the apparentness of a product's danger to avoid liability, and must instead prioritize safer designs. This shift will likely increase litigation opportunities for plaintiffs in design defect cases, allowing juries to consider the broader context of design choices and feasible safety improvements, rather than being limited by the obviousness of a hazard.
