Lexplug logoLexplug

North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.

Supreme Court of the United States
39 S. Ct. 221, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 2234, 249 U.S. 119 (1919)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A contract for the repair of an existing vessel is a maritime contract, and a claim arising from it falls within federal admiralty jurisdiction, regardless of whether the repairs are performed while the vessel is afloat, in a dry dock, or hauled up on land.


Facts:

  • North Pacific Steamship Company (Steamship Company) owned the steamship Yucatan, which was moored in Puget Sound and required extensive repairs after being wrecked and submerged.
  • The Steamship Company entered into a contract with North Pacific Shipbuilding Company (Shipbuilding Company) for the vessel's repair.
  • The contract stipulated that the Shipbuilding Company would tow the vessel to its shipyard and provide labor, materials, and the use of equipment, including a marine railway to haul the vessel onto dry land.
  • The repairs were to be conducted under the supervision of the Steamship Company's employees.
  • The Shipbuilding Company towed the Yucatan to its yard, where some repairs were made while the vessel was afloat.
  • The vessel was then hauled out of the water onto the marine railway on dry land for significant repairs to its bottom plates and tail shaft.
  • After the repairs were completed, a dispute arose over the final payment due to the Shipbuilding Company.

Procedural Posture:

  • North Pacific Shipbuilding Company filed a libel in personam in a U.S. District Court against North Pacific Steamship Company to recover a balance due for repair work.
  • The Steamship Company filed an answer and a cross-libel seeking damages for delay.
  • Following a hearing on the merits, the District Court entered a decree in favor of the Shipbuilding Company and dismissed the cross-libel.
  • The Steamship Company then filed a motion to vacate the decree and dismiss the cause for want of jurisdiction.
  • The District Court denied the motion.
  • The Steamship Company filed a direct appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on the sole question of admiralty jurisdiction.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a contract for the repair of a steamship, which involves hauling the vessel out of the water and onto dry land using a marine railway, fall within federal admiralty jurisdiction?


Opinions:

Majority - Mr. Justice Pitney

Yes, a contract for the repair of a steamship that includes hauling it onto dry land falls within federal admiralty jurisdiction. The test for admiralty jurisdiction over contracts is the subject matter of the contract—whether it has reference to maritime service or transactions—not the location where the work is performed. The court distinguished between contracts for ship construction, which are not maritime because a vessel is not legally a ship until it is launched, and contracts for ship repair, which are maritime because they concern an existing vessel already subject to admiralty jurisdiction. The court concluded there is no meaningful difference between repairs made while a vessel is afloat, in a dry dock, or hauled up on land; the nature of the service is identical and fundamentally maritime. The use of the marine railway was merely incidental to the primary purpose of the contract, which was the repair of the vessel.



Analysis:

This decision solidified and expanded the scope of federal admiralty jurisdiction over ship repair contracts. It established a clear, bright-line rule that the maritime nature of a repair contract depends on the subject matter (an existing ship), not the physical location of the work. By explicitly stating that repairs on dry land are subject to admiralty jurisdiction, the Court resolved prior uncertainty and ensured that a uniform body of federal maritime law would govern all aspects of ship repair, promoting consistency in maritime commerce.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co. (1919) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.