Noil v. Noil
1997 WL 600763, 699 So.2d 1134 (1997)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Louisiana law, property acquired during a marriage through the effort, skill, or industry of either spouse, including prize money from a sweepstakes, is classified as community property.
Facts:
- Bernadine Sept Noil and Larry William Noil were married in 1978.
- In November 1990, during the marriage, Ms. Noil entered a sweepstakes contest by completing and submitting a word search puzzle from a newspaper.
- Ms. Noil won the contest and was awarded a check for $25,000, payable to her individually.
- Ms. Noil deposited the prize check into a joint checking account she held with Mr. Noil.
- In January 1991, Ms. Noil purchased a house for $5,000 using funds from the joint account that originated from the prize money.
- The act of sale for the house was executed in the names of both Ms. Noil and Mr. Noil.
- The couple used additional prize money to remodel and add on to the house and later secured a joint loan for further renovations.
Procedural Posture:
- Bernadine Sept Noil was granted an uncontested divorce from Larry William Noil.
- Ms. Noil filed a petition in the trial court to partition the assets of the former community.
- In her petition, Ms. Noil classified the family home as her separate property.
- Mr. Noil filed an answer disputing the home's classification and asserted it was community property.
- The trial court, after a hearing, ruled in favor of Ms. Noil, declaring the home to be her separate property.
- Mr. Noil, as appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a home purchased during a marriage with sweepstakes winnings awarded to one spouse individually constitute community property under Louisiana law?
Opinions:
Majority - Lottinger, Chief Judge
Yes, the home is community property. The classification of property as separate or community is fixed at the time of its acquisition and depends on the source of the funds used, not the name on the title. Property acquired during the marriage is presumed to be community. Ms. Noil's sweepstakes winnings were acquired during the marriage through her skill and effort in completing the puzzle. Because Louisiana Civil Code art. 2341, which defines separate property, does not list winnings of this nature as an exception, they must be classified as community property under art. 2338. Therefore, the house purchased with these community funds is also community property.
Analysis:
This case addresses a res nova issue (an issue of first impression) in Louisiana by establishing the classification of lottery or sweepstakes winnings acquired during a marriage. The court's decision solidifies the strong presumption of community property in Louisiana and narrowly construes the statutory exceptions for separate property. This ruling creates a clear precedent that prizes won through skill or effort during a marriage are not analogous to individual gifts or inheritances, but are instead fruits of a spouse's industry, making them part of the community estate subject to division upon divorce.
