Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
45 F.2d 119 (1930)

ELI5:

Rule of Law:

Copyright protection for a literary work extends only to the author's specific expression of ideas, not to the general ideas, themes, or stock characters themselves. The less developed characters are, the less they can be copyrighted.

Facts:

Anne Nichols authored a play titled 'Abie's Irish Rose.'
Nichols' play centers on the son of a prosperous, widowed Jewish merchant and the daughter of a widowed Irish Catholic, who marry in secret.
The central conflict in 'Abie's Irish Rose' is the fathers' intense religious zealotry and their mutual outrage upon discovering their children's interfaith marriage.
The fathers in Nichols' play ultimately reconcile due to their shared affection for their newborn twin grandchildren.
Universal Pictures Corporation produced a motion picture titled 'The Cohens and The Kellys.'
Universal's film features the daughter of a poor Jewish family and the son of a poor Irish family, who live next to each other in a state of perpetual enmity and whose children secretly marry.
The conflict in 'The Cohens and The Kellys' is driven by social class and animosity, which is exacerbated when the Jewish family inherits a large fortune.
The families in Universal's film reconcile after the Jewish father honestly reveals that the fortune rightfully belongs to the Irish father; the grandchild plays no role in the reconciliation.

Procedural Posture:

Anne Nichols sued Universal Pictures Corporation in federal trial court for copyright infringement.
The trial court found in favor of the defendant, Universal Pictures Corporation, and issued a decree affirming no infringement.
The plaintiff, Anne Nichols, appealed the trial court's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a motion picture infringe on a copyrighted play when it uses a similar general theme and stock character types but differs substantially in its plot, character development, and sequence of events?

Opinions:

Majority - L. Hand

No. A motion picture does not infringe on a copyrighted play if the similarities between the two works are limited to general ideas, themes, or stock characters, rather than the specific, developed expression of those elements. Copyright cannot protect an author's 'ideas,' only their expression. While protection goes beyond literal copying, there is a point in a series of 'abstractions' of a work where the material becomes a generalized idea in the public domain. In this case, the only matter common to both works is a quarrel between a Jewish and an Irish father, the marriage of their children, and a reconciliation. The plots, the motivations of the characters, and the sources of conflict are fundamentally different. The characters themselves are either stock figures (the low-comedy Jew and Irishman) or are so 'faintly indicated' as to be mere stage properties, lacking the specific development required for copyright protection. Therefore, Universal took no more than the law allowed.

Analysis:

This case is foundational in copyright law for establishing Judge Learned Hand's 'abstractions test' for determining the line between an unprotectable idea and a protectable expression. This framework requires courts to analyze the 'patterns of increasing generality' in a work to find where the author's protectable expression ends and the public domain of ideas begins. The decision solidifies the principle that stock characters and general plot themes are not copyrightable, which has profoundly influenced subsequent infringement cases. It forces plaintiffs to demonstrate substantial similarity in the specific details and arrangement of a work, not just in its overarching concept.

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corporation (1930)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"