New York Botanical Garden v. Board of Standards & Appeals
694 N.E.2d 424, 91 N.Y.2d 413, 671 N.Y.S.2d 423 (1998)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A determination by a zoning board of appeals regarding what constitutes a permissible "accessory use" is entitled to judicial deference and will be upheld so long as it is rational, supported by substantial evidence, and not arbitrary or capricious.
Facts:
- Fordham University, an educational institution on an 80-acre campus in the Bronx, is situated in a medium-density residential (R6) zoning district.
- Since 1947, Fordham has operated WFUV, an on-campus, noncommercial, 50,000-watt educational radio station as part of its communications and media studies degree programs.
- In 1993, Fordham applied for a permit to construct a new 480-foot radio tower and a one-story transmitting building on its campus.
- The new tower was a practical necessity for the station to comply with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations regarding ground radiation levels from its existing antenna.
- After Fordham received a building permit and began construction, the adjacent New York Botanical Garden objected to the project.
- Fordham presented evidence that 180 university-affiliated radio stations are part of National Public Radio and over half of those operate at a 50,000-watt signal strength.
Procedural Posture:
- Fordham University's application for a building permit was approved by the New York City Department of Buildings (DOB).
- The New York Botanical Garden objected, and the DOB Commissioner issued a final determination confirming that the tower was a valid accessory use.
- The Botanical Garden administratively appealed to the Board of Standards and Appeals (BSA), which affirmed the Commissioner's determination.
- The Botanical Garden commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding in the trial court to annul the BSA's determination.
- The trial court dismissed the Botanical Garden's petition.
- The Botanical Garden (appellant) appealed to the intermediate appellate court (Appellate Division), which unanimously affirmed the trial court's decision.
- The New York Court of Appeals (the highest court) granted the Botanical Garden (appellant) leave to appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Was the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals' (BSA) determination that a 480-foot radio tower is an 'accessory use' to Fordham University's educational mission arbitrary and capricious or unsupported by substantial evidence?
Opinions:
Majority - Wesley, J.
No. The BSA's determination that the radio tower constituted a permissible accessory use was rational, supported by substantial evidence, and not arbitrary or capricious. Courts must give deference to the BSA's interpretation of zoning resolutions because its members are experts in land use and planning. The determination of whether a use is 'clearly incidental to, and customarily found in connection with' a principal use is a fact-based analysis that benefits from this expertise, not a question of pure legal interpretation. Fordham provided substantial evidence that operating a 50,000-watt, NPR-affiliated radio station is commonplace for universities. The Zoning Resolution's classification of accessory uses is functional, not structural; since the radio station is a customary use, the tower necessary for its operation is also accessory. The fact that the Zoning Resolution specifically lists accessory radio towers as an example of a permissible use without imposing height restrictions, unlike other accessory uses, supports the conclusion that the size of such structures should be based on an individualized assessment by the BSA.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the high degree of judicial deference afforded to administrative agencies, such as zoning boards, when they make fact-intensive determinations within their area of expertise. It clarifies that the 'customarily found' element of the accessory use test is a factual inquiry, limiting the scope of judicial review and making it more difficult to challenge zoning decisions on these grounds. The ruling also establishes a key distinction between a functional 'use' (the radio station) and its structural manifestation (the tower), holding that if the use itself is customary, then the necessary supporting structures are generally permissible, even if their specific dimensions are unique. This precedent strengthens the authority of zoning boards to make nuanced, site-specific decisions without fear of being easily overturned in court.
