New Jersey v. City of New York
1931 U.S. LEXIS 158, 283 U.S. 473, 51 S. Ct. 519 (1931)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A state may be enjoined from engaging in activities that cause a public nuisance and irreparable harm to the property and citizens of another state, regardless of whether the harmful acts occur outside the injured state's territorial jurisdiction.
Facts:
- For many years, the City of New York has disposed of large quantities of its garbage by dumping it daily into the Atlantic Ocean.
- Prior to 1918, New York used a reduction system for garbage disposal but reverted to sea dumping after a plant fire and a contractor's failure.
- Ocean currents and winds consistently carry large masses of this floating garbage onto the beaches of New Jersey.
- New Jersey's Atlantic coast is lined with numerous resort municipalities whose economies are heavily dependent on their beaches for tourism, bathing, and fishing.
- The garbage deposits on New Jersey beaches are noxious, unsightly, constitute a menace to public health, interfere with bathing, damage fishing nets, and reduce property values.
- New Jersey officials have repeatedly complained to New York about the pollution for years.
- Internal reports from New York City committees, dating back to 1907 and 1921, acknowledged that dumping garbage at sea was undesirable and would likely cause nuisance issues for coastal communities.
- While New York has some incinerators, it has not built a sufficient number to handle its volume of garbage, leading to continued large-scale dumping at sea.
Procedural Posture:
- The State of New Jersey filed a complaint against the City of New York, invoking the U.S. Supreme Court's original jurisdiction.
- New York filed an amended answer denying the allegations and asserting as a defense that it was acting under federal permits.
- The Supreme Court appointed a Special Master to take evidence and report his findings of fact and conclusions of law.
- The Special Master filed a report concluding that New York was creating a public nuisance and recommended that an injunction be granted.
- The City of New York filed exceptions to the Special Master's material findings and conclusions, bringing the matter before the full Supreme Court for a final decision on the Master's report.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a city's action of dumping garbage into the ocean, which then washes ashore and creates a public nuisance in a neighboring state, constitute an enjoinable offense even if the dumping occurs in international waters under a federal permit?
Opinions:
Majority - Mr. Justice Butler
Yes, a city's action of dumping garbage into the ocean that creates a public nuisance in another state is an enjoinable offense. The Court possesses jurisdiction to grant an injunction because it has personal jurisdiction over the defendant, and the situs of the acts creating the nuisance is irrelevant when the injury occurs within the Court's territorial reach. Federal permits issued by the supervisor of the harbor of New York for dumping at designated locations do not grant immunity from liability for the resulting nuisance or deprive an injured party of legal relief. The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that New York's garbage is the primary cause of the pollution on New Jersey's shores, and New York has unreasonably delayed implementing a more appropriate method of disposal.
Analysis:
This case is a landmark decision in interstate environmental law, affirming the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction to resolve disputes involving public nuisances that cross state boundaries. It establishes the critical principle that a state cannot escape liability for environmental harm caused to a neighbor simply by conducting the polluting activity in international waters or outside the neighbor's direct jurisdiction. The ruling reinforces that regulatory permits for an activity do not necessarily immunize the actor from civil liability for the harm that activity causes, a foundational concept in environmental tort law. This precedent empowers states to protect their natural resources from out-of-state pollution and serves as a basis for subsequent environmental litigation between states.
Unlock the full brief for New Jersey v. City of New York