Morgan v. Nagodish
40 La. Ann. 246 (1888)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A bayou or other body of water that runs through private land is not considered public 'seashore' unless its banks are directly inundated by the sea during its highest tides. A landowner whose property, acquired from the state prior to relevant legislation, contains such a waterway has the exclusive right to use it for planting oysters.
Facts:
- The plaintiff holds title to an 800-acre tract of coastal land, which he acquired through a chain of title originating from the State of Louisiana with patents issued in 1878.
- The property is penetrated by an inlet known as 'Bayou Cook,' which connects Bay Bastían, an arm of the Gulf of Mexico, to Bay Adam, an interior bay.
- Bayou Cook contains a brackish mix of salt water that enters from the Gulf via Bay Bastían and fresh water that enters from the Mississippi River via adjacent swamps.
- A group of Austrian fishermen, the defendants, established a colony on the banks of Bayou Cook within the plaintiff's property lines.
- The defendants built cabins on posts, moored their boats, and began planting and bedding their own oysters in the shallow waters of Bayou Cook.
- The plaintiff protested the defendants' activities, asserting they were trespassing on his private property.
Procedural Posture:
- The plaintiff sued the defendants in a Louisiana trial court.
- The plaintiff prayed for and obtained an injunction to restrain the defendants from trespassing, camping, and planting oysters on his property and its water front.
- The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff, perpetuating the injunction.
- The defendants appealed the trial court's judgment to the Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a bayou that runs through private land and connects to an arm of the sea considered 'seashore' under Louisiana law, thereby making it public property not susceptible to private ownership?
Opinions:
Majority - Watkins, J.
No. A bayou running through private land is not public seashore unless it meets the specific legal definition of being land over which the sea spreads during its highest tide. The evidence demonstrated that Bayou Cook, while connected to the Gulf of Mexico, is not directly flooded over its banks by the sea's highest winter tides. Instead, salt water flows into it from another bay. Citing the Louisiana Civil Code's definition of 'seashore' (R.C.C. 451) and principles from Roman law, the court concluded that Bayou Cook does not qualify as seashore and is therefore private property. Furthermore, under Act 106 of 1886, because the plaintiff's land was sold by the state before the act's passage, he possesses the exclusive right to use the bodies of water running through his land for the purpose of planting oysters, distinguishing his rights from the public's right to fish for natural oysters in common waterways.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the distinction between public and private rights in coastal waterways under Louisiana law. It establishes that mere hydrological connection to the sea and the presence of brackish water are insufficient to classify a bayou on private land as public 'seashore.' The ruling reinforces the strength of private property rights against claims of public use, hinging the determination on the specific physical action of the sea's highest tides. This precedent is significant for defining the scope of private ownership and exclusive commercial rights, such as aquaculture, in Louisiana's complex coastal environment.
