Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.
1953 N.C. LEXIS 427, 77 S.E.2d 682, 238 N.C. 185 (1953)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A lawful business may be liable for a private nuisance if its operation intentionally and unreasonably causes a substantial non-trespassory invasion of another's interest in the private use and enjoyment of land, regardless of the degree of care or skill exercised to avoid such injury.
Facts:
- Plaintiffs owned and resided on a nine-acre tract of land.
- High Penn Oil Company operated an oil refinery on an adjacent property.
- The refinery continuously emitted noxious gases and odors as part of its normal operations.
- These gases and odors escaped onto the plaintiffs' property.
- The emissions substantially impaired the plaintiffs' ability to use and enjoy their home and land.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiffs sued High Penn Oil Company and Southern Oil Transportation Company in a trial court, alleging the operation of an oil refinery constituted a private nuisance.
- The case proceeded to a jury trial.
- At the close of evidence, both defendants moved for a compulsory nonsuit, arguing the evidence was insufficient.
- The trial court denied the defendants' motions.
- The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.
- The trial court entered a judgment consistent with the jury's verdict.
- Both defendants appealed the judgment to the reviewing appellate court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the operation of a lawful business that intentionally and unreasonably emits noxious gases and odors onto a neighboring property constitute an actionable private nuisance, even in the absence of a finding of negligence?
Opinions:
Majority - Ervin, J.
Yes. A lawful business that intentionally and unreasonably interferes with the use and enjoyment of neighboring land constitutes an actionable private nuisance, even without proof of negligence. The court clarified that negligence and nuisance are distinct fields of tort liability. While a lawful enterprise like an oil refinery is not a nuisance per se (a nuisance at all times), it can become a nuisance per accidens (a nuisance in fact) by reason of its location or the manner of its operation. The court rejected High Penn Oil Company's argument that a nuisance per accidens requires negligent conduct. The controlling principle is the maxim 'Sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas' (so use your own property as not to injure that of another). An invasion is 'intentional' when the defendant knows it is resulting or is substantially certain to result from its conduct. Because High Penn knew its operations were producing and releasing noxious gases that were substantially certain to invade the plaintiffs' property, the invasion was intentional. This intentional and unreasonable invasion, which substantially impaired the plaintiffs' use of their land, is the essence of a private nuisance, making proof of negligence unnecessary.
Analysis:
This case is significant for clearly separating the torts of nuisance and negligence. It establishes that for intentional nuisances, the focus is not on the reasonableness of the defendant's conduct (i.e., whether they exercised due care), but on the reasonableness of the interference with the plaintiff's property rights. This precedent strengthens protections for landowners against ongoing invasions from neighboring industrial or commercial activities. Future cases involving pollution or other interferences from lawful businesses would not require plaintiffs to meet the often more difficult burden of proving negligent operation, but could instead focus on the intentional nature and substantiality of the harm to their property interests.
Unlock the full brief for Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.