Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.
77 S.E.2d 682, 238 N.C. 185 (1953)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A party that intentionally and unreasonably causes a substantial nontrespassory invasion of another's interest in the private use and enjoyment of land is liable for private nuisance, regardless of the degree of care or skill exercised to avoid such injury.
Facts:
- James D. Morgan and his wife (Morgan) owned a nine-acre tract of land.
- On this land, Morgan maintained their dwelling, a restaurant, and a trailer park for 32 trailers.
- High Penn Oil Co. operated an oil refinery on an adjoining tract of land.
- Beginning in 1950, the refinery emitted nauseating gases and odors in great quantities.
- These emissions spread over the Morgans' property, substantially impairing their ability to use and enjoy it for themselves and their tenants and customers.
Procedural Posture:
- James D. Morgan and his wife sued High Penn Oil Co. and Southern Oil Transportation Co. in a state trial court.
- The complaint sought temporary damages and an injunction to abate an alleged private nuisance.
- At trial, the defendants moved for a compulsory nonsuit, which the trial court disallowed.
- The jury found for the plaintiffs, and the trial court entered a judgment awarding damages and issuing an injunction.
- Both defendants, as appellants, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the operation of a lawful business constitute an actionable private nuisance if it intentionally and unreasonably invades another's interest in the use and enjoyment of their land, even if the business is not operated negligently?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Ervin
Yes, the operation of a lawful business can constitute an actionable private nuisance without proof of negligence if it intentionally and unreasonably interferes with another's property rights. Nuisance and negligence are distinct torts. A private nuisance per accidens (in fact) can be created or maintained without negligence, especially when the invasion of another's interest in their land is intentional. An invasion is considered intentional if the actor knows that the invasion is resulting from their conduct or is substantially certain to result from it. Because the evidence showed that High Penn intentionally and unreasonably caused noxious gases to escape onto the Morgans' land, substantially impairing their use and enjoyment, it was sufficient to establish an actionable and abatable private nuisance, regardless of whether High Penn was negligent.
Analysis:
This case firmly distinguishes the torts of private nuisance and negligence, clarifying that liability for an intentional nuisance does not depend on proving a lack of reasonable care. It establishes that the core inquiry for an intentional private nuisance is the unreasonableness of the interference with the plaintiff's use and enjoyment of their property, not the defendant's standard of care. This principle allows property owners to seek redress for substantial, ongoing harms from lawful, non-negligently operated businesses, focusing the legal analysis on the impact on the victim rather than the conduct of the actor. The decision reinforces the fundamental property law maxim that one must use their property so as not to injure another's.
Unlock the full brief for Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.