Morgan Stanley & Co. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.
1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20439, 570 F.Supp. 1529 (1983)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A boilerplate non-refunding provision in a debenture indenture, which prohibits redemption from the proceeds of lower-cost debt, does not prevent a redemption funded directly from the proceeds of a common stock offering, even if the issuer has contemporaneously engaged in lower-cost borrowing for other purposes.
Facts:
- In May 1981, ADM Midland Company (ADM) issued $125 million in 16% debentures containing a provision that, prior to May 1991, ADM could not redeem them from the proceeds of any debt borrowed at an interest rate below 16.08%.
- Subsequent to issuing the debentures, ADM borrowed funds at interest rates below 16.08% on two separate occasions in May 1982 and March 1983 for other corporate purposes.
- In January and June of 1983, ADM raised over $146 million through two common stock offerings.
- In May 1983, Morgan Stanley & Company, Inc. (Morgan Stanley) purchased over $16 million in principal amount of ADM's 16% debentures on the open market.
- On June 1, 1983, ADM announced it would redeem all the 16% debentures, explicitly stating that the funds for the redemption came directly from the proceeds of its recent common stock offerings and depositing those proceeds with a trustee.
Procedural Posture:
- Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. sued ADM Midland Company in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging breach of contract and securities law violations.
- Morgan Stanley sought a preliminary injunction to stop the planned redemption of the debentures.
- The district court denied Morgan Stanley's motion for a preliminary injunction.
- Both parties then filed cross-motions for summary judgment on all claims.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a debenture's non-refunding provision, which prohibits redemption 'from the proceeds, or in anticipation, of' lower-cost debt, bar the issuer from redeeming the debentures with funds directly raised from a common stock offering when the issuer has contemporaneously borrowed other funds at a lower interest rate?
Opinions:
Majority - Sand, District Judge
No. A debenture's non-refunding provision does not bar redemption with funds from a common stock offering, even with contemporaneous lower-cost borrowing. The court adopted the 'source rule,' holding that the dispositive factor is the direct source of the funds used for the redemption, not the issuer's overall borrowing activity. The court found the contract language ambiguous and concluded that traditional principles of contract construction were unhelpful. It heavily relied on the persuasive authority of Franklin Life Insurance Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., which had interpreted nearly identical boilerplate language to establish the 'source rule.' The court emphasized the paramount interest of uniformly construing boilerplate provisions in financial markets to avoid uncertainty. It rejected Morgan Stanley's case-by-case approach as one that would create greater subjectivity and uncertainty for investors than a clear rule based on the source of the funds.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the 'source rule' for interpreting common non-refunding clauses in bond indentures, prioritizing consistency and predictability in capital markets over a more flexible, intent-based interpretation of boilerplate contract language. By following the precedent set by Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., the court provides issuers with greater financial flexibility, allowing them to refinance high-interest debt with equity even when they are simultaneously borrowing at lower rates for other purposes. For bondholders, this ruling clarifies that the protection offered by such clauses is limited to redemptions directly or indirectly funded by cheaper debt, not a general prohibition on early redemption during periods of falling interest rates.
