Monroe Bowling Lanes v. Woodsfield Livestock Sales
17 Ohio App. 2d 146, 46 Ohio Op. 2d 208, 244 N.E.2d 762 (1969)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A license to use another's land becomes an irrevocable easement by estoppel when the landowner knowingly permits the user to make substantial expenditures in reasonable reliance on the license, especially where the landowner also receives a reciprocal benefit from the arrangement.
Facts:
- In 1957, Charles Bott, plaintiff's predecessor, obtained permission from Sam Hanna, secretary-treasurer of Woodsfield Livestock Sales, to connect to Woodsfield's water line.
- Hanna presented Bott's request to the Woodsfield board of directors, but the board never took official action.
- In 1961, the plaintiff purchased the property, constructed a costly bowling alley building, and connected its water supply to the tap on the Woodsfield line.
- From 1961 until 1967, patrons of Woodsfield Livestock Sales regularly used the plaintiff's large parking lot during weekly auctions.
- A continuing controversy over the parking situation arose between the plaintiff and Woodsfield.
- In 1967, following the dispute, Woodsfield removed a section of its water line, which stopped the water service to the plaintiff's bowling lanes.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiff sued defendant, Woodsfield Livestock Sales, in the Common Pleas Court of Monroe County, seeking a permanent injunction.
- Defendant filed a cross-petition against the plaintiff for damages.
- The Common Pleas Court (trial court) denied the permanent injunction, holding that plaintiff had only a revocable license.
- The trial court awarded plaintiff $10 in nominal damages and entered judgment for the plaintiff on the defendant's cross-petition.
- Plaintiff, as appellant, appealed the trial court's denial of the injunction to the Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a landowner create an irrevocable easement by estoppel when they knowingly permit an adjacent owner to make substantial expenditures in reliance on permission to use the owner's water line, especially when the owner receives a reciprocal benefit from the adjacent owner's property for several years?
Opinions:
Majority - Brown, J.
Yes. The plaintiff has an easement by estoppel to connect with and use the defendant's water line. While a mere parol license is typically revocable, it can become an irrevocable easement by estoppel when a party is misled and substantially changes their financial position to their prejudice in reliance on that license. Here, the defendant, through its agent, knew the plaintiff was connecting to the water line and making a substantial investment in constructing a bowling alley dependent on that water source. The defendant acquiesced to this for six years while also receiving a reciprocal benefit—the use of plaintiff's parking lot for its own patrons. It would be an injustice to allow the defendant to revoke the permission after such reliance and mutual benefit. The defendant is estopped from denying the easement, even without formal board approval, because it had knowledge of the facts and retained the benefits of the transaction.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the doctrine of easement by estoppel in Ohio property law, transforming a typically revocable license into a permanent property right based on principles of equity. It demonstrates that a party's inaction or acquiescence, coupled with another's detrimental reliance and a reciprocal benefit, can create rights that were never formally granted in writing. The case serves as a crucial precedent for disputes where informal land use agreements lead to significant capital investments, preventing a licensor from unjustly revoking permission after the licensee has incurred substantial costs. Future cases involving informal property use will look to this decision to determine when fairness dictates that a permissive use can no longer be revoked.
