Mississippi Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Brewer
2005 Miss. App. LEXIS 484, 922 So.2d 807 (2005)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An aggravation of a compensable work-related injury caused by subsequent medical treatment is considered part of the original injury. Consequently, an employer or its workers' compensation carrier has a statutory right to intervene and seek subrogation from any recovery the employee obtains from a third-party tortfeasor responsible for the aggravation.
Facts:
- In November 1994, Dot Brewer sustained a back injury while performing her job duties for her employer, the Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi.
- Brewer sought medical treatment for her work-related injury from Daniel Dare, M.D., and the River Region Medical Corporation.
- In December 1994, Dr. Dare performed back surgery on Brewer in an attempt to alleviate her back pain.
- As a direct result of the surgery, Brewer became a paraplegic.
Procedural Posture:
- Dot Brewer filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits against her employer, Riverboat Corporation, which was initially denied.
- Brewer filed a separate negligence action in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County against Dr. Daniel Dare and River Region Medical Corporation.
- The Workers’ Compensation Commission determined Brewer’s back injury and its surgical aggravation were compensable, ordering Riverboat to pay benefits.
- Riverboat and its insurance carriers filed a motion to intervene in Brewer's negligence action to protect their subrogation interests.
- After Brewer reached a settlement with the doctor and hospital, she filed a motion to dismiss the employer's motion to intervene.
- The circuit court granted Brewer's motion to dismiss, denying the employer and carriers the right to intervene.
- Riverboat Corporation, Home Insurance Company, and MIGA (Appellants) appealed the circuit court's decision to the Mississippi Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an employer or its workers' compensation carrier have a statutory right under Miss. Code Ann. § 71-3-71 to intervene in an employee's negligence action against a third-party doctor whose malpractice aggravated the initial work-related injury?
Opinions:
Majority - Ishee, J.
Yes. An employer or its carrier has a statutory right to intervene in such an action because an aggravation of a primary injury by medical or surgical treatment is legally considered part of the original compensable injury. The court, relying on precedent from Trotter v. Litton Sys. Inc., held that 'the initial injury is the cause of all that follows,' establishing a direct chain of causation from the work incident to the subsequent medical aggravation. Since the Workers’ Compensation Commission had already determined the initial injury was compensable and ordered the employer to pay for the surgical aggravation, the entire injury falls under the workers' compensation statute. This triggers the employer's explicit statutory right under § 71-3-71 to intervene and seek subrogation. The court distinguished the 'made whole' doctrine, holding that it applies to contractual subrogation, not the absolute right granted by this statute, which is designed to prevent an employee's double recovery.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the 'chain of causation' principle in Mississippi workers' compensation law, affirming that subsequent injuries arising from medical treatment for a work injury are compensable. It clearly distinguishes between statutory subrogation, which provides an absolute right of reimbursement to prevent double recovery, and equitable or contractual subrogation, which may be subject to the 'made whole' doctrine. This ruling provides certainty for employers and insurance carriers, ensuring they can recoup benefits paid for medical malpractice from the responsible third party, thereby maintaining the integrity of the workers' compensation system's subrogation mechanism.
Unlock the full brief for Mississippi Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Brewer