Lexplug logoLexplug

Minonk State Bank v. Grassman

Supreme Court of Illinois
447 N.E.2d 822, 95 Ill. 2d 392 (1983)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A joint tenant can unilaterally sever a joint tenancy by conveying their interest in the property from themselves as grantor to themselves as grantee, thereby destroying the right of survivorship.


Facts:

  • Real estate was conveyed to Gustav, Agnes, Ida, and Frieda Grassman as joint tenants with right of survivorship.
  • Following the deaths of Gustav and Frieda, Agnes Grassman and Ida Grassman remained as the sole surviving joint tenants.
  • Ida Grassman executed and recorded a deed conveying the property from herself as grantor to herself as grantee.
  • The deed explicitly stated its purpose was 'to dissolve any and all rights of the survivorship' associated with the original joint tenancy.
  • Agnes Grassman had no knowledge of this conveyance before her death.

Procedural Posture:

  • Minonk State Bank, as administrator of Agnes Grassman's estate, filed a declaratory judgment action against Ida Grassman in the circuit court of Woodford County (a trial court).
  • The circuit court found in favor of defendant Ida Grassman, ruling that the conveyance was ineffective and she was the sole owner through survivorship.
  • Plaintiff Minonk State Bank appealed the decision to the Illinois Appellate Court.
  • The appellate court reversed the circuit court's judgment, holding that the conveyance had severed the joint tenancy.
  • Defendant Ida Grassman, as the appellant, was granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a joint tenant sever a joint tenancy by executing and recording a deed that conveys the property from themselves as grantor to themselves as grantee?


Opinions:

Majority - Justice Goldenhersh

Yes. A joint tenant severs a joint tenancy by conveying the property to themselves. The court held that the common law requirement of having a separate grantor and grantee for a valid conveyance is an obsolete formality. This ancient rule was based on the ceremony of livery of seisin, which has been replaced by modern conveyancing through written instruments. The court reasoned that since the historical basis for the rule no longer exists, the rule itself should be abandoned to allow the law to adapt to modern realities. Therefore, a joint tenant may unilaterally sever the tenancy by executing a deed to themselves, converting the ownership into a tenancy in common without the need for a 'straw man' intermediary.



Analysis:

This decision modernized Illinois property law by eliminating the archaic requirement of using a 'straw man' to sever a joint tenancy. By allowing a joint tenant to sever the tenancy through a direct conveyance to themselves, the court simplified the process, reduced transaction costs, and promoted legal consistency. This ruling aligns the method for severing a joint tenancy with modern statutory procedures for creating one, demonstrating the judiciary's willingness to evolve common law principles to reflect contemporary practices and discard outdated formalities.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Minonk State Bank v. Grassman (1983) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Minonk State Bank v. Grassman