Milner Hotels, Inc. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
822 F. Supp. 341 (1993)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A party's material breach of its contractual obligations excuses the non-breaching party from its own performance duties, including payment, for the period after the breach occurs until the contract is validly terminated.
Facts:
- Norfolk & Western Railway Company (N&W) contracted with Milner Hotels, Inc. (Milner) to house its employees.
- The contract required Milner to maintain the hotel in 'good, clean and sanitary conditions' and to comply with all relevant laws and regulations.
- The contract allowed either party to terminate without cause by giving thirty days' written notice.
- On March 10, 1991, a fire occurred at the Milner Hotel, causing smoke and water damage.
- A subsequent inspection on March 15 revealed numerous electrical and fire code violations and the presence of crumbling, friable asbestos throughout the hotel.
- N&W removed its employees after the fire and informed Milner that the dangerous conditions needed to be remedied before employees would return.
- Milner obtained cost estimates for the repairs but did not perform the work, instead demanding assurances from N&W that it would reoccupy the hotel upon completion.
- After N&W refused to provide assurances, Milner sold the hotel and its contents at a public auction on April 26, 1991.
Procedural Posture:
- Milner Hotels, Inc. originally filed a civil action for breach of contract against Norfolk & Western Railway Company in the Circuit Court of Mercer County, West Virginia (a state trial court).
- Norfolk & Western Railway Company removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia.
- Norfolk & Western Railway Company moved for summary judgment.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a hotel's failure to maintain its premises in a safe, clean, and code-compliant condition constitute a material breach of contract that excuses its client from the duty to pay for guaranteed rooms during the period between the discovery of the breach and the effective date of a valid contract termination?
Opinions:
Majority - Faber, District Judge
Yes. A party's failure to perform its obligations under a contract is a material breach if it deprives the injured party of the benefit it reasonably expected to receive. By failing to provide a safe, clean, and legally compliant hotel, Milner committed a material breach that excused N&W from its duty to pay for the rooms. The court reasoned that to recover damages for breach of contract, a plaintiff must first show its own compliance with the contract. The numerous code violations and the presence of friable asbestos were not trivial; they deprived N&W of the essential benefit it bargained for—a safe place for its employees. Applying the factors from the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 241, the court found the breach material because N&W was completely deprived of the contract's benefit, could not be adequately compensated for the lack of safety, and Milner took no steps to cure its failure. Therefore, Milner's material breach absolved N&W of any obligation to pay during the period between the fire and the effective date of the termination.
Analysis:
This case provides a clear application of the material breach doctrine, emphasizing that a party cannot expect to enforce a contract when it has failed to provide the fundamental benefit the other party bargained for. It establishes that severe safety and health violations, such as fire code infractions and the presence of asbestos, go to the core of a lodging contract and are not minor defects. The decision is also significant for illustrating that when the underlying facts are undisputed, the question of whether a breach is material can be decided as a matter of law by a judge on summary judgment, rather than requiring a jury trial. This precedent strengthens the position of a non-breaching party to suspend performance immediately upon discovering a breach that fundamentally undermines the contract's purpose.
Unlock the full brief for Milner Hotels, Inc. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.