Miller v. Kirk

New Mexico Supreme Court
905 P.2d 194, 120 N.M. 654 (1995)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

Under the New Mexico Wrongful Death Act, a cause of action for wrongful death cannot be maintained for a nonviable fetus. To be considered a 'person' for the purposes of the Act, the fetus must have been viable at the time of the injury.


Facts:

  • Cynthia Miller was 18 to 22 weeks pregnant with a male fetus.
  • On August 6, 1991, Miller was involved in an automobile accident with a car driven by Robert Kirk.
  • As a result of the accident, Miller suffered blunt trauma to her abdomen, which caused the placenta to separate from the uterus wall.
  • An emergency Caesarean section was performed, and the fetus was delivered with cardiac activity (a heartbeat).
  • The fetus died within minutes of birth.
  • All parties agreed that the fetus was nonviable, meaning it was incapable of sustaining life outside the mother's womb, at the time of the collision.

Procedural Posture:

  • Cynthia Miller (Appellant) filed a complaint in a New Mexico trial court against Robert Kirk (Appellee) for personal injury and wrongful death.
  • The personal injury claims were settled.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Kirk on the wrongful death claim, concluding that no independent cause of action exists for the death of a nonviable fetus.
  • Miller appealed the summary judgment ruling to the New Mexico Court of Appeals.
  • The Court of Appeals certified the case to the New Mexico Supreme Court, identifying it as a matter of 'substantial public interest.'

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does the New Mexico Wrongful Death Act recognize an independent cause of action for the wrongful death of a nonviable fetus?


Opinions:

Majority - Franchini, Justice

No. The New Mexico Wrongful Death Act does not recognize a cause of action for the wrongful death of a nonviable fetus. The central inquiry is whether a nonviable fetus is a 'person' under the Act. In the absence of a clear legislative directive, the court must determine as a matter of social policy where to draw the line for liability. Following the vast majority of jurisdictions, the court adopts viability as the standard. A nonviable fetus is incapable of an independent existence and thus cannot be regarded as a separate entity capable of maintaining an action. This standard avoids actions based on speculation and uncertainty. The fact that the fetus was born alive with a heartbeat does not change the analysis; viability at the time of injury is the dispositive factor, not live birth. This aligns with the Act's character as a survival statute, as it would be anomalous to recognize a survival action for a fetus that never had the capacity to survive.



Analysis:

This decision solidifies New Mexico's position within the majority of states, establishing a bright-line rule based on viability for wrongful death claims involving a fetus. The ruling clarifies that the term 'person' under the state's Wrongful Death Act has a specific legal meaning that excludes nonviable fetuses, regardless of whether they show momentary signs of life post-delivery. This precedent prevents the expansion of tort liability for prenatal injuries to the earliest stages of pregnancy, limiting such claims to cases where the fetus had a realistic chance of independent survival and thereby providing a more predictable legal standard for future cases.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Miller v. Kirk (1995) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.