Metsch v. University of Florida
1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5131, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2194, 550 So. 2d 1149 (1989)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An applicant's desire for admission to a state university does not constitute a 'substantial interest' under Florida's Administrative Procedure Act, and thus, a university's denial of admission does not entitle the applicant to a formal administrative hearing.
Facts:
- Benjamin Metsch, a student at Columbia University, applied for admission to the fall 1989 entering class of the University of Florida College of Law.
- Metsch's application was not accepted for automatic admission based on his undergraduate grade point average and Law School Admissions Test (LSAT) score.
- His application was consequently placed in a 'hold' category for review by the Faculty Admissions Committee.
- In April 1989, the University of Florida informed Metsch that his application for admission had been denied.
Procedural Posture:
- After his application was denied, Metsch wrote to the University of Florida requesting reconsideration and a formal administrative hearing pursuant to section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
- The University reconsidered Metsch's application but affirmed its denial of admission.
- The University's Interim President denied Metsch's request for an administrative hearing.
- Metsch (appellant) appealed the denial of his request for a hearing to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, against the University of Florida (appellee).
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a state university's denial of an application for admission to its law school determine the applicant's 'substantial interests' under the Florida Administrative Procedure Act, thereby entitling the applicant to a formal administrative hearing?
Opinions:
Majority - Per Curiam
No, a state university's denial of an application does not determine the applicant's substantial interests. An applicant's sincere desire to attend a university is merely a hope or a 'unilateral expectation,' not a 'substantial interest' that would trigger the right to a formal administrative hearing under section 120.57(1) of the Florida Statutes. To have a substantial interest, an individual must demonstrate an immediate injury in fact of a type that the administrative proceeding is designed to protect, which Metsch failed to do. Furthermore, even if such an interest existed, section 120.57(5) exempts from formal hearings any proceeding where the substantial interests of a 'student' are determined by the State University System; interpreting this to grant greater hearing rights to non-student applicants than to current students would be an unreasonable and skewed reading of the statute.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the discretion of state universities in their admissions processes by clarifying the narrow scope of what constitutes a 'substantial interest' under Florida's Administrative Procedure Act. It prevents the administrative court system from being flooded with appeals from every unsuccessful university applicant, establishing that disappointment or a frustrated desire does not amount to a legally cognizable injury requiring a formal hearing. The ruling effectively channels grievances related to admissions, particularly those hinting at discrimination, away from the administrative hearing process and toward separate civil rights actions in state or federal court.
