Merry Gentleman, LLC v. George and Leona Productions, Inc.
799 F.3d 827 (2015)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A plaintiff seeking reliance damages for breach of contract must establish a causal link between the specific breach and the damages claimed. When a defendant has substantially performed under the contract, the plaintiff cannot recover its entire investment as damages without showing how the defendant's specific breaches destroyed the entire value of the performance.
Facts:
- Merry Gentleman, LLC (Merry Gentleman) hired actor Michael Keaton to direct and star in the motion picture 'The Merry Gentleman' through his company, George & Leona Productions, Inc.
- Merry Gentleman spent approximately $5.5 million to produce the film.
- Keaton completed the directing of the film, which was his primary obligation under the contract.
- The finished film was accepted into the Sundance Film Festival and received some critical praise.
- Merry Gentleman alleged that Keaton breached the directing contract by failing to prepare the first cut on time, submitting incomplete cuts, failing to cooperate during post-production, and failing to promote the film adequately.
- The film was a commercial failure at the box office.
Procedural Posture:
- Merry Gentleman, LLC sued Michael Keaton and George & Leona Productions, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (a federal trial court) for breach of contract.
- Keaton filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Merry Gentleman failed to produce evidence that his alleged breaches caused its damages.
- The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Keaton.
- The district court first held that Merry Gentleman had forfeited its claim for expectation damages.
- The district court then held that Merry Gentleman had failed to produce sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact on whether Keaton's alleged breaches caused the $5.5 million in reliance damages sought.
- Merry Gentleman, LLC (appellant) appealed the district court's decision on reliance damages to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, with Keaton's company as the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a plaintiff seeking reliance damages satisfy its initial burden of showing causation by merely proving it expended money in reliance on a contract, when the defendant has substantially performed and the alleged breaches relate only to the quality or timeliness of that performance?
Opinions:
Majority - Hamilton, Circuit Judge
No. A plaintiff seeking reliance damages for breach of contract must do more than simply show it spent money on a project; it must establish a causal connection between the defendant's specific breaches and the losses it seeks to recover. While the causation threshold for reliance damages is low, it still exists. The burden only shifts to the breaching party to prove the plaintiff would have incurred the loss anyway after the plaintiff first makes a threshold showing of causation. The court distinguished between a total breach, where a defendant walks away from a deal, and substantial but flawed performance. Here, Keaton substantially performed by delivering a finished, critically-praised film. The alleged breaches, such as tardiness and inadequate promotion, cannot plausibly be linked to the loss of the entire $5.5 million investment. To award the full production cost would give Merry Gentleman a windfall and place it in a better position than if the contract had never been made, effectively turning reliance damages into an insurance policy against business risk.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the causation requirement for reliance damages under Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 349, particularly in cases of substantial performance. It prevents a plaintiff from using a partial or minor breach to recover its entire investment in a failed venture, reinforcing the principle that damages must be the direct result of the breach. The court's distinction between total non-performance and flawed performance provides a crucial framework for lower courts. This precedent limits the ability of parties to shift all business risks to the other party through a breach of contract claim, ensuring damages remain compensatory rather than punitive or a form of insurance.
Unlock the full brief for Merry Gentleman, LLC v. George and Leona Productions, Inc.