Merrill v. Jansma
2004 WY 26, 86 P.3d 270 (2004)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
The Wyoming Residential Rental Property Act abrogates the common law rule of landlord immunity by imposing a statutory duty on landlords to maintain rental units in a safe condition fit for human habitation. A breach of this duty establishes a standard of reasonable care under the circumstances for personal injury claims arising from unsafe conditions on the premises.
Facts:
- Sherri Pritchard rented a mobile home owned by Alvina Jansma.
- During the tenancy, a step leading to the front porch became loose.
- Pritchard attempted to repair the step with nails, but the repair failed.
- Pritchard verbally informed the property manager that the step was loose.
- The manager stated she would fix the step with screws and subsequently attempted a repair without Pritchard's knowledge.
- The manager's repair effort was apparently unsuccessful.
- On February 19, 2000, Pritchard's mother, Sue A. Merrill, was ascending the steps when the loose step separated from the porch.
- As a result of the step separating, Merrill fell and injured her right shoulder.
Procedural Posture:
- Sue A. Merrill filed a negligence claim against Alvina Jansma in the Wyoming district court (trial court).
- Jansma filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing she owed no legal duty to Merrill.
- The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Jansma, holding she had no duty under either the Residential Rental Property Act or common law.
- Merrill, as appellant, appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the Supreme Court of Wyoming.
- Jansma is the appellee in the appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the Wyoming Residential Rental Property Act abrogate the common law rule of landlord immunity and impose a duty on landlords to maintain rental premises in a reasonably safe condition, the breach of which can lead to tort liability for personal injuries sustained by a tenant's guest?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Kite
Yes, the Wyoming Residential Rental Property Act abrogates the common law rule of landlord immunity and imposes a duty on landlords to maintain rental premises in a reasonably safe condition, the breach of which can result in tort liability. The Act's plain language in § 1-21-1202(a), requiring landlords to maintain rental units 'in a safe and sanitary condition fit for human habitation,' is directly contrary to the common law rule of immunity and clearly establishes a new duty. The court concluded this legislatively created duty establishes a new standard of conduct for personal injury claims on rental property: a standard of reasonable care under all circumstances, which replaces the archaic common law rule and its complex exceptions. Furthermore, the Act's written notice requirement (§ 1-21-1203) applies only to tenant remedies like rent abatement or lease termination, not to common law tort claims for personal injury, which are not precluded by a tenant's failure to provide such notice.
Analysis:
This landmark decision fundamentally alters Wyoming's landlord-tenant law, moving it from a state that adhered to the traditional common law rule of landlord immunity to one aligned with the modern majority view. By holding that the Residential Rental Property Act creates a statutory duty of care for landlords, the court established a basis for negligence claims that did not previously exist outside of a few narrow exceptions. This ruling significantly increases the potential liability for landlords and enhances legal protections for tenants and their guests. Future personal injury cases involving rental properties in Wyoming will now be analyzed under a general negligence framework of 'reasonable care under the circumstances' rather than the former, more restrictive, immunity-based doctrine.
Unlock the full brief for Merrill v. Jansma