Lexplug logoLexplug

Menorah Chapels at Millburn v. Needle

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
899 A.2d 316 (2006)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A contract for funeral services that includes specific, material religious rituals is not automatically divisible simply because the services are itemized. A material breach of such a contract can give rise to a claim for consequential damages, including emotional distress, as such damages are foreseeable given the nature of the services.


Facts:

  • Emanuel Needle's father-in-law, an orthodox Jew, passed away on a Friday.
  • Needle contracted with Menorah Chapels at Millburn, a self-described 'Jewish Funeral Chapel,' for funeral services.
  • The contract specifically included the provision of 'shomerim' (watchers) to conduct a continuous vigil ('shmeerah') over the body until the funeral, an orthodox Jewish custom.
  • The 'Statement of Goods and Services Selected' specified six shifts of shomerim at a total cost of $900.
  • Menorah Chapels subcontracted the provision of shomerim to a burial society.
  • The burial society provided only three of the six shifts of shomerim, leaving the decedent's body unattended for a significant period contrary to orthodox Jewish custom.
  • Needle and his family were not informed of this failure until moments before the funeral service was scheduled to begin.

Procedural Posture:

  • Menorah Chapels sued Emanuel Needle in the Special Civil Part for payment of funeral services.
  • Needle filed a counterclaim alleging negligence, breach of warranty, and emotional distress.
  • The initial action was dismissed without prejudice, and Menorah Chapels later filed a new complaint.
  • Needle filed an identical counterclaim to the new complaint.
  • The trial court denied Needle's motion to dismiss and granted Menorah Chapel's motion for summary judgment dismissing Needle's counterclaim.
  • The trial court subsequently granted summary judgment in favor of Menorah Chapel on its complaint for payment.
  • Needle, as appellant, appealed the summary judgment orders to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, with Menorah Chapels as the respondent.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Under New Jersey law, is a contract for funeral services that includes specific religious rituals considered entire, rather than divisible, allowing for the recovery of consequential damages for emotional distress upon a material breach?


Opinions:

Majority - Payne, J.A.D.

Yes, a contract for funeral services can be considered entire, and damages for emotional distress are recoverable for its breach. The trial court erred in concluding the contract was divisible and in dismissing the counterclaim for emotional distress. A contract is not made divisible merely by the itemization of services, particularly when such itemization is a consumer protection requirement. Divisibility depends on the parties' intent and whether the value of the partial performance is materially diminished by the failure of the other part; this is a question for a jury. Furthermore, consequential damages for emotional distress are recoverable for breach of a funeral services contract because the very purpose of such a contract is to provide comfort and solace, making mental anguish a foreseeable result of a breach. Citing precedent like Spiegel v. Evergreen Cemetery Co., the court affirmed that where the subject matter of a contract makes it probable the parties contemplated satisfaction for mental anguish upon breach, such damages are available. Therefore, Needle's counterclaim for breach of contract seeking damages for emotional distress should not have been dismissed.



Analysis:

This case establishes that contracts for highly personal services, such as funerals involving religious rites, may be treated as entire contracts where full performance is a material condition. It significantly clarifies that regulatory requirements for price itemization do not, by themselves, prove a contract is severable. The decision strengthens the ability of plaintiffs to recover for emotional distress in breach of contract cases where the contract's primary purpose is emotional or spiritual well-being. This precedent requires service providers in sensitive fields to recognize that a failure in one area can undermine the value of the entire service, exposing them to liability beyond a simple refund for the unperformed part.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Menorah Chapels at Millburn v. Needle (2006) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Menorah Chapels at Millburn v. Needle