McIntyre v. Scarbrough
471 S.E.2d 199 (1996)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A life tenant's failure to exercise ordinary care for the preservation of property, demonstrated by failing to pay ad valorem taxes as required by both the deed and statute, constitutes waste and results in the forfeiture of the life estate to the remaindermen as a matter of law.
Facts:
- In October 1988, Russell and Sally Scarbrough purchased a 16.59-acre tract of land from Dillie McIntyre.
- The warranty deed reserved a life estate for McIntyre in a 1.2-acre portion of the land, which included a mobile home, porch, and shed.
- The reservation stipulated that McIntyre's life estate was for her natural life and during her occupancy as a personal residence, and that she was responsible for maintenance and payment of ad valorem taxes.
- McIntyre, who was 90 years old at the time of the dispute, became unable to live in the mobile home due to health problems and resided in a convalescent home.
- McIntyre left her personal belongings in the mobile home and stated her intention to return.
- The ad valorem property taxes on the 1.2-acre tract went unpaid for the years 1991 through 1993, and on the improvements for 1992 through 1994.
- The Scarbroughs paid the tax arrearage to protect their remainder interest.
- The mobile home fell into a state of dilapidation, lacked water and gas service, was deemed unfit for habitation, and posed fire and health hazards.
Procedural Posture:
- Russell and Sally Scarbrough filed a petition in the trial court to establish title and terminate Dillie McIntyre's life estate.
- The Scarbroughs moved for summary judgment.
- The trial court initially denied the Scarbroughs' motion for summary judgment.
- Upon the Scarbroughs' motion for reconsideration, the trial court reversed its prior ruling and granted summary judgment in their favor, terminating the life estate.
- Dillie McIntyre, as the appellant, appealed the grant of summary judgment to the Supreme Court of Georgia.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a life tenant's failure to pay ad valorem property taxes and maintain the property, as required by the deed and by law, constitute waste sufficient to cause a forfeiture of the life estate as a matter of law?
Opinions:
Majority - Thompson, Justice
Yes, a life tenant's failure to pay property taxes and maintain the property constitutes waste, causing a forfeiture of the life estate as a matter of law. Although a genuine issue of fact exists as to whether McIntyre's absence constituted a failure to 'occupy' the residence, her failure to preserve the property constitutes waste. A life tenant has a duty to exercise the ordinary care of a prudent person for the property's preservation. The unrebutted evidence shows McIntyre failed to pay ad valorem property taxes for several years, which she was obligated to do by both law and the specific terms of the deed. This neglect is a want of ordinary care that exposes the property to a tax sale, thereby injuring the remainder interest. While the question of waste is generally for a jury, the undisputed failure to pay taxes is sufficient to establish waste and justify forfeiture of the life estate as a matter of law.
Dissenting - Benham, Chief Justice
No, while the evidence may support a finding of waste at trial, it does not establish waste as a matter of law sufficient to grant summary judgment. The question of waste is generally one for a jury. Forfeitures are not favored in the law, and the statute authorizing it for waste must be strictly construed. Forfeiture should only be authorized for waste committed with 'an utter disregard of the rights of those who are thereafter to take,' implying a wilful act rather than mere permissive waste. There is evidence that McIntyre's failure to maintain the property was due to her age and illness, not intentional disregard. The question of a party's intent is a classic issue of material fact for a jury to decide, not for a court to resolve on summary judgment.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the doctrine of waste in Georgia, establishing that a life tenant's failure to pay property taxes is a significant breach of duty that can, by itself, justify forfeiture as a matter of law. The ruling makes it easier for remaindermen to terminate a life estate via summary judgment if the non-payment of taxes is undisputed, potentially circumventing a jury trial on the tenant's intent. The dissent highlights the ongoing tension between punishing permissive neglect versus requiring wilful or voluntary waste for a harsh remedy like forfeiture, arguing that the life tenant's circumstances and intent should be considered by a jury.
Unlock the full brief for McIntyre v. Scarbrough