Lexplug logoLexplug

Matter of Vincenti

The Supreme Court of New Jersey
458 A.2d 1268 (N.J. 1983) 92 N.J. 591 (1983)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

An attorney's duty of zealous advocacy does not permit a pattern of abusive, intimidating, and disrespectful conduct towards the court, opposing counsel, and witnesses. Such behavior constitutes professional misconduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and warrants significant disciplinary action, including suspension from the practice of law.


Facts:

  • During a child abuse trial (Coolbaugh v. Vincenti), attorney Lester T. Vincenti represented the defendant father, D.K.
  • In open court, Vincenti repeatedly accused the trial judge of collusion, cronyism, racism, and conducting a 'kangaroo court.'
  • Vincenti accused the opposing Deputy Attorney General of being a 'thief, a liar and a cheat' in court and filed a baseless ethics complaint against her.
  • Vincenti alleged that a court-appointed psychologist was an 'extortionist' and baselessly claimed the judge was complicit in this 'extortion.'
  • Vincenti sent a letter to the judge stating the judge had an 'obvious breakdown' and was sleep-walking through his judicial duties in a 'dream world.'
  • In the courthouse corridors, Vincenti directed obscenities at opposing counsel, referred to an uninvolved female attorney with derogatory names, pressed a pen into another attorney's chest, and intentionally bumped into opposing counsel.
  • Three months later, in a separate matrimonial case (Baldasarre v. Baldasarre), Vincenti was held in contempt after telling the trial judge, 'you are simply ridiculous, you know.'

Procedural Posture:

  • The District V Ethics Committee filed a presentment (formal charge) against respondent Lester T. Vincenti based on his conduct in two separate court cases.
  • The Committee held a hearing, found Vincenti guilty of numerous ethical violations, and issued a presentment to the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB).
  • The DRB conducted a review and was satisfied by clear and convincing evidence that Vincenti's conduct was unethical.
  • The DRB issued a Decision and Recommendation to the Supreme Court of New Jersey, unanimously recommending that Vincenti be suspended from the practice of law for one year.
  • The matter came before the Supreme Court of New Jersey for a final decision based on the DRB's recommendation.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a sustained pattern of belligerent, abusive, and disrespectful conduct by an attorney—both in and out of the courtroom and across multiple cases—violate the rules of professional conduct and warrant suspension, even when the attorney claims the conduct was part of zealous client advocacy?


Opinions:

Majority - Per Curiam

Yes. A sustained pattern of such conduct violates the rules of professional conduct and warrants suspension. The court found that respondent's behavior was not zealous advocacy but a 'calculated pattern of irresponsible, abusive and obnoxious behavior' intended to intimidate all parties, including the judge and opposing counsel. The court rejected respondent's justifications as incredible, noting that his actions far exceeded the limits of acceptable advocacy and demonstrated a fundamental failure to comprehend the proper role of an advocate. The conduct, which spanned multiple proceedings, tarnished the image of the bar and was 'prejudicial to the administration of justice,' thus requiring discipline more severe than a reprimand.



Analysis:

This case serves as a seminal warning about the clear distinction between zealous advocacy and unprofessional, sanctionable conduct. It establishes that a pattern of ad hominem attacks, disrespect for the tribunal, and intimidation of opposing counsel is not a permissible litigation tactic. The decision reinforces that an attorney's duty to the court and the administration of justice is paramount and that civility and decorum are not optional formalities but essential components of the legal system. Future disciplinary actions for attorney misconduct will likely cite this case to underscore that a lack of contrition and a repeated pattern of abuse will lead to severe sanctions like suspension.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Matter of Vincenti (1983) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Matter of Vincenti