Marshall v. Sam Dell's Dodge Corp.
451 F. Supp. 294 (1978)
Rule of Law:
Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, compliance with minimum wage requirements must be determined on a workweek-by-workweek basis. An employer may not average an employee's compensation over a period longer than one week to meet its statutory obligations.
Facts:
- Sam Dell’s Dodge Corp. employed car salespersons under a complex compensation plan that included a base salary of $56 per week, commissions, and performance bonuses.
- In weeks when a salesperson made no sales, they received only the base salary of $56, which was below the federal minimum wage for the hours they worked.
- The dealership's showroom was open 66 hours per week, and the court found that the salespersons worked an average of 55 hours per week.
- The dealership required salespersons to sign pre-filled time slips that knowingly and inaccurately stated they worked only 36 hours per week.
- The dealership provided some salespersons with 'demonstrator' cars for business and limited personal use.
- The Department of Labor had previously investigated the dealership on two separate occasions for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act concerning other employees.
Procedural Posture:
- The Secretary of Labor filed a complaint against Sam Dell’s Dodge Corp., Sam Dell, Sr., and Sam Dell, Jr. in the United States District Court.
- The complaint alleged violations of the minimum wage and record-keeping requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
- The case was tried to the court in a bench trial.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an employer violate the minimum wage provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act by paying an employee less than the statutory minimum for a particular workweek, even if the employee's total compensation over a longer period (such as a month or year) averages out to more than the minimum wage?
Opinions:
Majority - Port, Senior District Judge
Yes. An employer violates the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay the required minimum wage for each hour worked within a single workweek. The workweek is the operative time period for measuring compliance, and compensation from different weeks cannot be averaged to cure a deficit in a particular week. The court's reasoning is that the FLSA takes a single workweek as its standard, as supported by regulations and case law like Roland Electrical Co. v. Black. The purpose of the Act, as explained in Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'Neil, is to ensure employees can maintain a minimum standard of living, which requires timely, weekly payments, not future lump sums. The dealership established the workweek as the pay period through its own regular payment practices. Furthermore, the value of 'demonstrator' cars cannot be counted as wages because they primarily benefit the employer. Finally, the dealership's actions were deemed willful due to its long-running falsification of time records and prior FLSA investigations, triggering a three-year statute of limitations.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the 'workweek standard' as the indivisible unit for minimum wage compliance under the FLSA, preventing employers from using commission or bonus structures to obscure sub-minimum wage payments during slow periods. It establishes a clear, bright-line rule that high earnings in one week cannot offset a minimum wage deficit in another, reinforcing the Act's purpose of providing a stable, weekly 'minimum standard of living.' This precedent significantly impacts employers with commission-based pay plans, requiring them to implement mechanisms (like a draw against commission) to ensure every employee's paycheck meets the minimum wage for all hours worked in each specific week.
Gunnerbot
AI-powered case assistant
Loaded: Marshall v. Sam Dell's Dodge Corp. (1978)
Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"