Marsh v. Frost National Bank
2004 WL 170458, 129 S.W.3d 174 (2004)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A trust whose purpose is to distribute funds to all members of a large, indefinite class of people without regard to need or the effect of the gift is not a charitable trust because it merely provides financial enrichment to individuals rather than promoting the social interest of the community as a whole.
Facts:
- Charles Vartan Walker wrote a holographic will before his death.
- Article V of the will directed his executor to sell a specific parcel of land, known as 'tract 3 of the V.M. Donigan 456.80 Partition.'
- The proceeds from the sale were to be invested to create a trust called the 'James Madison Fund.'
- The will stated, 'The ultimate purpose of this fund is to provide a million dollar trust fund for every American 18 years or older.'
- The trust was to accumulate for approximately 346 years to reach its goal.
- The will specified that no one should be denied their share based on race, religion, marital status, sexual preference, or wealth.
- Charles Walker died on March 13, 2000.
Procedural Posture:
- Frost National Bank, the executor of Charles Walker's estate, filed a declaratory judgment action in probate court to seek clarification on constructing Article V of the will.
- Appellants (Anna Spohn Welch Marsh, Noel Marsh, and Holly McKee) filed an answer asserting that Article V was void under the rule against perpetuities.
- The Texas Attorney General intervened, arguing that the will created a charitable trust and moved to have the court apply the cy pres doctrine to reform it.
- The trial court held a hearing and found that the will evidenced a general charitable intent and established a valid charitable trust not subject to the rule against perpetuities.
- The trial court granted the Attorney General's request to exercise its cy pres powers and, after a second hearing, signed a final judgment modifying Article V.
- Appellants appealed the trial court's final judgment to the Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a provision in a will directing the creation of a trust to eventually provide one million dollars to every American adult establish a valid charitable trust that is exempt from the rule against perpetuities?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Rodriguez
No, the provision does not establish a valid charitable trust. A trust's purpose is only charitable if it benefits the community as a whole, not just its individual members. The court analyzed the trust's purpose under the categories defined in the Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 368, concluding it could only potentially fall under the 'beneficial to the community' category. However, a trust that simply distributes money to every inhabitant, regardless of their wealth or need, fails to promote the social interest of the community. Walker's trust was a generous and benevolent act of financial enrichment for individuals, but it lacked the requisite public benefit to be legally defined as charitable. Because the trust is not charitable, it is subject to the rule against perpetuities. As the trust is of indefinite duration, it violates the rule and is therefore invalid in its current form.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the legal definition of a 'charitable purpose' under Texas law, particularly distinguishing between private benevolence and public benefit. It establishes that a trust's aim for widespread, unconditional cash distribution to individuals does not meet the 'beneficial to the community' standard required for a charitable designation. This precedent reinforces that to qualify for the legal advantages of a charitable trust, such as exemption from the rule against perpetuities, the trust's purpose must promote a broader social interest rather than simply enriching individuals. The ruling serves as a crucial guide for estate planners and courts in evaluating the validity of trusts with unconventional or broad donative aims.
