Marquez v. Casa de Espana de Puerto Rico
59 F. Supp. 3d 409 (2014)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Puerto Rico law, a property owner's failure to adequately warn invitees of a known or reasonably foreseeable hazardous condition constitutes a breach of the duty of care, forming the basis for a premises liability claim distinct from a negligent design claim.
Facts:
- Casa de España de Puerto Rico is a civic and cultural center with a building organized around an interior courtyard.
- A door-less arched entryway connects the lobby to the interior courtyard, and this entryway contains a one-inch step.
- On August 15, 2012, Olga Marquez and her family visited Casa de España with the intention of dining at the second-floor restaurant.
- While walking from the courtyard into the lobby through the entryway, Marquez tripped on the one-inch step and fell, sustaining injuries.
- A sign warning of the step was present, but it was positioned to be visible only to people walking from the lobby to the courtyard, not the other way around.
- The parties dispute whether a yellow and black warning strip was present on the step on the day of the incident.
- The parties also dispute which route Marquez initially took to enter the courtyard, which affects whether she would have seen the warning sign before her fall.
- Prior to Marquez's fall, there were no recorded accidents or falls in the area of the entryway.
Procedural Posture:
- Olga Marquez and her husband filed a lawsuit against Casa de España de Puerto Rico and its insurers in the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, alleging negligence.
- Defendants filed an answer to the complaint.
- After discovery, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that the plaintiffs could not prove the essential elements of their negligence claim and requesting the court dismiss the case entirely.
- Plaintiff filed an opposition to the Defendants' motion, arguing that genuine issues of material fact existed.
- Defendants filed a reply to the Plaintiff's opposition.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the existence of genuine disputes over material facts regarding the adequacy of a warning for a step and the foreseeability of injury preclude summary judgment in a premises liability action?
Opinions:
Majority - Gustavo A. Gelpí
Yes. Summary judgment is precluded because genuine disputes of material fact exist regarding the defendant's negligence. A plaintiff in a premises liability case based on a failure to warn of a static condition does not need to present expert testimony as would be required in a negligent design case. Here, disputed facts about the presence of a warning strip and the visibility of a warning sign create a jury question as to whether the defendant breached its duty of care. Furthermore, a defendant's own safety precautions, such as placing a warning sign, can be used as evidence that the risk of harm was foreseeable, even without a history of prior accidents. Because a reasonable jury could find for the plaintiff on the disputed issues of breach of duty and foreseeability, summary judgment must be denied.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the important distinction between a premises liability claim based on a failure to warn and one based on negligent design. By classifying the plaintiff's claim as a failure to warn, the court lowered the evidentiary bar, clarifying that expert testimony on design standards is not required. The analysis of foreseeability is also significant; the court established that a defendant's own preventative measures (like a warning sign) can be used as evidence that the defendant foresaw the potential danger, making it more difficult for property owners to win summary judgment by arguing a lack of prior incidents. This ruling protects plaintiffs by ensuring that genuine factual disputes about the adequacy of warnings are resolved by a jury, not by a judge at the summary judgment stage.
Unlock the full brief for Marquez v. Casa de Espana de Puerto Rico