Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
281 F. Supp. 944 (1967)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Carmack Amendment, a common carrier's liability for misdelivery does not extend to special or consequential damages unless the carrier had notice of the special circumstances that would make such damages a foreseeable result of the breach at the time the contract of carriage was made.
Facts:
- Marquette Cement Manufacturing Company sold two different types of cement to two divisions of Vulcan Materials Company: 'air entrained' cement for the Concrete Pipe Division and standard cement for the Chattanooga Rock Products Division.
- Historically, Marquette shipped 'air entrained' cement to Concrete Pipe via the L&N and Southern Railway, and standard cement to Rock Products via the L&N and Central of Georgia Railway.
- On March 27, 1964, Marquette shipped a hopper car of 'air entrained' cement intended for the Concrete Pipe Division.
- The bill of lading correctly identified the cargo as 'air entrained' cement and the consignee as the Concrete Pipe Division, but incorrectly listed the routing via the Central of Georgia Railway, the route used for Rock Products.
- A switching clerk for the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company (L&N), seeing the Central of Georgia routing and being unaware of the significance of 'air entrained' cement, rerouted the car for delivery to the Rock Products Division.
- Rock Products, which was expecting a shipment of standard cement and could not tell the difference by appearance, received the misdelivered car.
- Rock Products added its own air entraining agent to the already 'air entrained' cement, creating defective concrete.
- This defective concrete was used in the structural floor system of a nursing home and a garage floor, both of which subsequently failed and had to be removed and replaced at great expense.
Procedural Posture:
- Marquette Cement Manufacturing Company and Vulcan Materials Company (plaintiffs) brought an action for damages against the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company (defendant) in the U.S. District Court.
- The action was brought under the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 20(11).
- The case was submitted to the district court for a final decision based upon a stipulation of facts agreed upon by both parties.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a common carrier's liability for misdelivery under the Carmack Amendment extend to consequential damages resulting from the consignee's improper use of the goods, when the carrier had no notice of the special purpose of the goods or the potential consequences of their misuse?
Opinions:
Majority - Frank W. Wilson
No. A common carrier's liability for misdelivery does not extend to consequential damages unless such damages were foreseeable. Foreseeability for special damages requires that the carrier had notice of the special circumstances at the time of contracting. Here, the defendant L&N Railroad's duty was defined by the contract of carriage, and damages for its breach are governed by the rule of Hadley v. Baxendale. This rule limits recovery to damages that arise in the usual course of events or were reasonably in the contemplation of the parties at the time of contract formation. While the Carmack Amendment holds carriers liable for the 'full actual loss,' it does not abrogate the common law requirement of notice for the recovery of special or consequential damages. The mere notation of 'air-entrained cement' on the bill of lading was insufficient to put the carrier on notice of the specific use of the cement or that its misdelivery could lead to its adulteration and subsequent use in construction projects, resulting in costly removal. The doctrines of mislabeling and deviation are inapplicable. Therefore, the plaintiff's damages are limited to the direct, foreseeable losses: the value of the cement and the freight charges paid.
Analysis:
This case affirms the enduring relevance of the 19th-century Hadley v. Baxendale foreseeability rule within the modern statutory framework of the Carmack Amendment. It clarifies that the statute's 'full actual loss' provision does not create strict liability for all downstream consequences of a carrier's breach. The decision places a clear burden on shippers to communicate any special circumstances or potential for unusual damages to the carrier at the time of contracting if they wish to recover such consequential losses. This precedent reinforces that a carrier's liability is generally limited to the value of the goods themselves unless it is made aware of a greater risk, thus shaping the allocation of risk and the need for explicit communication in shipping contracts.
Unlock the full brief for Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.