Margie P. Hollins v. Robert Lee Powell
19 Fed. R. Serv. 506, 773 F.2d 191, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22905 (1985)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A single unconstitutional act by a municipal official, such as a mayor, constitutes official policy sufficient to subject the municipality to liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, when the official acts pursuant to the authority of their office.
Facts:
- Plaintiffs Margie Hollins, Mamie Wallace, Annette McNeil, and Lloyd Brown were commissioners on the Land Clearance Authority and Housing Authority (LCRA/HA) for the City of Wellston, having been appointed by the previous mayor.
- Robert Powell was elected mayor of Wellston on November 17, 1982, and began to question the legality of the plaintiffs' appointments.
- On December 8, 1982, the plaintiffs gathered for a scheduled LCRA/HA meeting in a room they had rented at City Hall.
- Mayor Powell interrupted the meeting, questioned the legality of their appointments, and demanded they adjourn.
- The plaintiffs refused Powell's demand, asserting their right to hold the meeting and noting the legal procedure for removal from office.
- In response to their refusal, Powell called the police.
- After conferring with Powell, the police arrested the plaintiffs for 'unlawful assembly' and 'failure to obey the command of a police officer' when they again refused to adjourn on advice of their counsel.
- The plaintiffs were detained for one to four hours, photographed by the press upon release, and the story was covered by local media; no formal charges were ever filed against them.
Procedural Posture:
- The plaintiffs sued Mayor Robert Powell and the City of Wellston in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, alleging constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
- Following a trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.
- The jury awarded the plaintiffs $300,000 in compensatory damages against both the City and Powell, and $500,000 in punitive damages against Powell.
- The district court entered a judgment on the verdict and subsequently denied the defendants' motion for a new trial.
- The City of Wellston and Robert Powell, as defendants-appellants, appealed the judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a single unconstitutional act by a city's mayor, perpetrated within the scope of the authority delegated to the mayor's office, constitute an official policy for which the city can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?
Opinions:
Majority - Floyd R. Gibson
Yes, a single unconstitutional act by a city's mayor, acting within his delegated authority, is sufficient to impose liability on the city under § 1983. The court reasoned that under the standard set by Monell v. Department of Social Services, municipal liability attaches when the execution of a government's policy or custom inflicts an injury. The acts of a mayor, whose edicts can fairly be said to represent official policy, fall squarely within this standard. Unlike the act of a low-level employee, a single unconstitutional act by a final municipal decisionmaker like a mayor is not an isolated incident but rather a direct execution of official policy. The court distinguished City of Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, which held a single act by a police officer was insufficient to infer a municipal policy, by noting that when a mayor acts, a wrong can be directly ascribed to a municipal decisionmaker. As Powell had the authority under the city's governmental structure to order the plaintiffs' removal from City Hall, his action was an official act for which the City of Wellston is liable. The court affirmed the liability verdict but found the damages excessive, remanding with orders to remit both the compensatory and punitive damage awards.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the 'policy or custom' requirement for municipal liability under § 1983 as established in Monell. It solidifies the principle that a single act by a high-ranking official with final policymaking authority (like a mayor) is sufficient to create municipal liability, without the need to show a pattern of similar conduct. This distinguishes the actions of top officials from those of lower-level employees, where a plaintiff might need to prove a widespread custom or inadequate training. The case serves as a key precedent for holding municipalities directly responsible for the constitutional torts committed by their executive leaders acting within the scope of their official powers.
Unlock the full brief for Margie P. Hollins v. Robert Lee Powell