Lexplug logoLexplug

Mahoney v. Mahoney

The Supreme Court of New Jersey
91 N.J. 488, 453 A.2d 527 (1982)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A professional degree or license acquired during a marriage is not marital property subject to equitable distribution. However, a supporting spouse may be entitled to reimbursement alimony for financial contributions made to the student spouse's education with the mutual expectation of future shared benefits.


Facts:

  • Melvin Mahoney and June Lee Mahoney married in 1971, at which time he had an engineering degree and she had a bachelor of science degree.
  • From September 1975 to January 1977, Melvin Mahoney attended the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, obtaining a Master of Business Administration (M.B.A.) degree.
  • During this 16-month period, June Lee Mahoney was the sole financial contributor to the household, providing approximately $24,000.
  • Melvin Mahoney made no financial contribution to the household while he was a student.
  • His educational expenses of approximately $6,500 were covered by veterans' benefits and a payment from the Air Force, not by the couple's finances.
  • In 1976, June Lee Mahoney began a part-time master's program in microbiology, which was paid for by her employer.
  • The parties separated in October 1978, shortly after Melvin Mahoney began working as a commercial lending officer.
  • At the time of the divorce, their annual incomes were comparable ($25,600 for Melvin, $21,000 for June Lee).

Procedural Posture:

  • Melvin Mahoney sued for divorce in the trial court, and June Lee Mahoney filed a counterclaim also seeking divorce.
  • The trial court granted the divorce and found the M.B.A. degree to be a 'property right,' ordering Melvin Mahoney to reimburse his ex-wife $5,000.
  • Melvin Mahoney, as appellant, appealed to the Appellate Division (an intermediate appellate court).
  • The Appellate Division reversed, holding that a professional degree is not property subject to equitable distribution and denying June Lee Mahoney, as appellee, any reimbursement.
  • The Supreme Court of New Jersey granted certification to hear the appeal from June Lee Mahoney.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a professional degree, acquired by one spouse during a marriage with financial support from the other, constitute marital 'property' subject to equitable distribution upon divorce?


Opinions:

Majority - Pashman, J.

No, a professional degree is not property subject to equitable distribution. An educational degree lacks the essential characteristics of property; it has no exchange or transferable value on an open market, cannot be sold, assigned, or inherited, and is a personal achievement of the holder. To treat it as property would be to distribute future earning capacity, which is speculative and constitutes income that would be acquired after the marriage, contrary to the equitable distribution statute. However, fairness requires a remedy when one spouse supports the other's education with the expectation of mutual benefit, and that expectation is defeated by divorce. To prevent the unjust enrichment of the student spouse, the court introduces the concept of 'reimbursement alimony,' which allows the supporting spouse to be compensated for the financial contributions made toward the other's education, including household and educational expenses.



Analysis:

This decision carves out a significant new remedy in matrimonial law to address the 'professional degree/divorce' scenario. By rejecting the classification of a degree as property, the court avoids the immense difficulty and speculation of valuing future earning capacity. Instead, it creates 'reimbursement alimony,' a flexible equitable tool that prevents unjust enrichment and compensates a spouse's tangible financial investment in the other's career, thereby resolving the fairness issue without radically expanding the definition of marital property.

G

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Mahoney v. Mahoney (1982)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"