Lowe v. Independent School District No. 1
363 F. App'x 548 (2010)
Rule of Law:
An employer may be liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for failing to reasonably accommodate a disabled employee if it fails to engage in a good-faith interactive process to identify appropriate accommodations, and a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether such failure occurred and whether working conditions were so objectively intolerable as to constitute constructive discharge.
Facts:
- Terrianne Lowe had polio as a child, resulting in a lifelong need for leg braces, multiple knee replacements, and physician's advice that prolonged walking and standing would accelerate muscle deterioration and eventually require a wheelchair.
- Since the 1988-89 school year, Lowe was employed by Independent School District No. 1 of Logan County, Oklahoma as a high school counselor, a sedentary position that required no accommodation for her disability.
- In Fall 2005, following complaints about Lowe's counseling performance, Superintendent Terry Simpson decided not to renew Lowe's extra-duty contract as a counselor for the 2006-07 school year and to reassign her as a classroom teacher, informing her in March 2006.
- In May 2006, the District did not renew the temporary teaching contract of Mary Rhinehart, a physical science teacher whose classroom was small, crowded, and not configured to accommodate a walker or wheelchair.
- Lowe came to understand she would likely be reassigned to teach physical science in Rhinehart's former classroom and, with the head of the science department, compiled a list of necessary accommodations.
- Before the end of the 2005-06 school year, Lowe presented her list of accommodations and a physician's letter outlining her limitations to Principal Jan Chadwick, HR Director Don Bowman, and Superintendent Simpson.
- Chadwick was subsequently informed by Bowman that no accommodation would be made and Lowe should be assigned to a non-laboratory science class, which Chadwick then relayed to Lowe.
- In August 2006, two weeks before school was to begin and having received no direct response from the District regarding her accommodation request, Lowe, along with an Oklahoma Education Association representative, met with Superintendent Simpson to discuss the requested accommodations.
Procedural Posture:
- Terrianne Lowe filed suit against Independent School District No. 1 of Logan County, Oklahoma in district court, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for reassignment and failure to accommodate, and a Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) claim.
- The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the District on both the ADA reassignment and failure-to-accommodate claims, and Lowe conceded the FMLA claim.
- Terrianne Lowe appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment on her failure-to-accommodate claim and her constructive discharge claim to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, where she was the appellant and the District was the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an employer's alleged failure to engage in a good-faith interactive process to determine reasonable accommodations, leading to an employee's resignation based on a reasonable belief of an unaccommodated assignment, preclude summary judgment on an ADA failure-to-accommodate claim and a constructive discharge claim?
Opinions:
Majority - Wade Brorby
Yes, an employer's alleged failure to engage in a good-faith interactive process can preclude summary judgment on an ADA failure-to-accommodate claim, and an employee's resignation can support a constructive discharge claim if a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether working conditions were intolerable. The court reviewed the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing evidence most favorably to Ms. Lowe. Under the ADA, discrimination includes failing to make reasonable accommodations to known physical limitations. Citing Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc., the court emphasized that the employer and employee must engage in an 'interactive process' to determine appropriate accommodations, which is 'typically an essential component' and requires 'good-faith communications.' A plaintiff can prevail if the employer's inadequate interactive process resulted in a failure to identify an appropriate accommodation. The district court erred in finding Ms. Lowe's belief about her assignment speculative, as substantial evidence suggested she reasonably concluded she would teach physical science in the crowded lab without accommodation. The District's inconsistent statements (to the EEOC vs. during litigation) and Superintendent Simpson's admitted lack of preparation for the August meeting supported this. Furthermore, Ms. Lowe’s resignation did not preclude her failure-to-accommodate claim, referencing Albert v. Smith’s Food & Drug Ctrs., Inc., which affirmed that disputed material facts about the interactive process preclude summary judgment. Finally, a genuine issue of material fact existed regarding Ms. Lowe's constructive discharge claim. Constructive discharge occurs when working conditions are so objectively intolerable that a reasonable person would feel forced to resign, and the court found that a reasonable person, knowing a demanding assignment would accelerate her muscular degeneration and need for a wheelchair, could feel compelled to resign. The court reversed the summary judgment and remanded for further proceedings.
Concurring - O’Brien
Yes, the case must be tried, as a factual dispute remains regarding whether the School District would have accommodated Lowe’s needs by reassignment to a non-laboratory classroom if she had not resigned. Justice O’Brien concurred but offered additional observations, noting Ms. Lowe's preference for counseling over teaching and her prior pursuit of other employment. While Ms. Lowe's assumption of being assigned to the Rhinehart classroom was reasonable given shared beliefs among school staff, Justice O'Brien highlighted that teacher assignments often change last minute and that Ms. Lowe had been told no accommodations would be made because she would be assigned to a non-laboratory class (potentially junior high). He acknowledged the factual dispute over whether Superintendent Simpson explicitly told Ms. Lowe she would not teach a lab science class. Justice O'Brien emphasized that the interactive process is a 'means' to an accommodation, not an end in itself, and an employer could avoid liability by simply providing a reasonable accommodation, even if the interactive process was flawed. He suggested Ms. Lowe's resignation 'short-circuited' the process, questioning her good faith for not suggesting alternatives or waiting for a definitive answer. However, he also noted the District's less-than-ideal 'interactive engagement' and the possibility that the junior high option was a post-hoc rationalization. Ultimately, because the record did not provide certain answers to these questions, a trial was necessary.
Analysis:
This case is significant for reinforcing that an employer's failure to engage in a good-faith interactive process, as mandated by the ADA, can create a triable issue for failure-to-accommodate claims, even if the employee resigns. It clarifies that the employee's reasonable belief of unaccommodated, intolerable working conditions, stemming from the employer's inadequate engagement, can support a claim for constructive discharge, thereby preventing employers from avoiding liability by delaying or obscuring final assignments. The decision underscores that while the interactive process is a 'means' to an end, it is an 'essential component' of the reasonable accommodation duty, and its breakdown can lead to liability if it results in the failure to identify appropriate accommodations. This case highlights the mutual obligation of good faith in the interactive process but ultimately places the burden on the employer to ensure reasonable accommodations are made or seriously discussed.
