Loetsch v. New York City Omnibus Corp.
1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1022, 291 N.Y. 308, 52 N.E.2d 448 (1943)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
In a wrongful death action, a decedent's declarations regarding their relationship with a beneficiary, such as statements in a will, are admissible not to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but as a 'verbal act' to show the decedent's state of mind, which is relevant to determining the beneficiary's reasonable expectancy of pecuniary loss.
Facts:
- A woman, the decedent, was married to Dean Yankovich.
- On December 2, 1940, the decedent executed a will.
- The will stated that her husband had treated her with cruelty and indifference and had failed to support her.
- As a result of his alleged conduct, the will limited her husband's inheritance to one dollar.
- The decedent died within four months of executing the will.
- A wrongful death action was brought for the benefit of her husband, Dean Yankovich.
Procedural Posture:
- A wrongful death action was filed in the Supreme Court, New York County, by the plaintiff against the defendants.
- At trial, the court granted the plaintiff's objection and excluded the decedent's will, which the defendants offered as evidence.
- A judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff.
- The defendants appealed the judgment to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court.
- The Appellate Division affirmed the trial court's judgment in a non-unanimous decision.
- The defendants, as appellants, then appealed to the Court of Appeals of New York.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
In a wrongful death action, is a decedent's will containing statements detailing a poor relationship with her beneficiary husband admissible as evidence to determine the husband's pecuniary loss?
Opinions:
Majority - Thacher, J.
Yes. In a wrongful death action, a decedent's will is admissible because the nature of the relationship between the decedent and the beneficiary is essential for calculating the beneficiary's pecuniary loss. The declarations in the will are evidence of the decedent’s state of mind and disposition towards the beneficiary, which directly bears on the reasonable expectancy of future financial assistance or support had the decedent lived. Such a declaration is not inadmissible hearsay because it is not offered to prove the truth of the statements (e.g., that the husband was actually cruel), but as a 'verbal act' that reveals the decedent's feelings, which in turn helps the jury assess the financial loss. A proper jury instruction can limit the use of this evidence to the calculation of pecuniary loss and prevent it from being used to compensate for loss of society or companionship.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies that the scope of relevant evidence in wrongful death actions extends to the decedent's state of mind concerning the beneficiaries. It solidifies the principle that pecuniary loss is not a fixed calculation based on legal obligations alone but is influenced by the actual nature and quality of the relationship. By classifying the decedent's declaration as a non-hearsay 'verbal act,' the court provides a pathway for admitting subjective but highly probative evidence, affecting how future litigants will prove or disprove damages by exploring the personal dynamics between a decedent and their survivors.
