Lizzio v. Jackson
226 A.D.2d 760, 640 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3463 (1996)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A modification of an established child custody arrangement requires a showing of a sufficient change in circumstances that demonstrates a real need for the change to ensure the child's best interest. A single factor, such as a parent's smoking, is insufficient on its own to warrant a change in custody without evidence of actual harm to the child.
Facts:
- Following their separation in 1988, the parties agreed that respondent (the mother) would have primary physical custody of their two children.
- The parties' son was diagnosed with asthma in 1986 and, in 1990, with an allergy to cigarette smoke.
- Respondent was a smoker before the parties' separation, at the time of their 1991 divorce, and continued to smoke thereafter.
- Respondent smoked in her son's presence until petitioner (the father) initiated this custody proceeding.
- After the proceeding began, respondent and her current husband began smoking only outside or on a back porch.
- Petitioner alleged that the son's health was deteriorating and his asthma attacks were more frequent, but provided no evidence to support these assertions.
Procedural Posture:
- The parties' separation agreement, which gave respondent physical custody, was incorporated into their 1991 divorce judgment.
- In January 1994, petitioner filed a petition in the Family Court of Fulton County seeking a change of physical custody.
- The Family Court granted petitioner's application and awarded him primary physical custody of the children.
- Respondent appealed the Family Court's order to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a parent's smoking in the home of an asthmatic child, without evidence that the child's health is deteriorating as a result, constitute a sufficient change in circumstances to warrant modifying an established physical custody arrangement?
Opinions:
Majority - Cardona, P. J.
No, a parent's smoking in the home of an asthmatic child, without evidence of the child's deteriorating health, does not alone constitute a sufficient change in circumstances to warrant modifying an established custody arrangement. To justify a change in custody, the petitioning parent must show a sufficient change in circumstances that demonstrates a real need for the change to protect the child's best interest. Here, the lower court erred by focusing exclusively on the respondent's smoking. The court noted that respondent had always been a smoker, so it was not a new circumstance, and there was no evidence that the son's health had actually worsened. While the respondent's smoking is a legitimate health concern, it is not, by itself, enough to justify the significant disruption of changing physical custody, especially when the respondent began smoking outside after the issue was raised.
Analysis:
This decision reinforces the high bar for modifying an existing custody order, emphasizing the need for stability in a child's life. It establishes that courts must conduct a holistic 'best interest' analysis based on a demonstrated change in circumstances rather than reacting to a single negative parental behavior, even a serious one. The ruling clarifies that a potential risk, like secondhand smoke, is not sufficient to change custody without concrete evidence of actual, resulting harm to the child. Future cases involving parental behavior will likely require a similar showing of tangible negative impact on the child before a court will modify custody.
Unlock the full brief for Lizzio v. Jackson