LeBoon v. Lancaster Jewish Community Center Ass'n
90 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,963, 503 F.3d 217, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 22328 (2007)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An organization whose structure and purpose are primarily religious, as determined by a multi-factor analysis of its characteristics and activities, qualifies as a 'religious corporation' exempt from Title VII's prohibition on religious discrimination, even if it is not formally controlled by a house of worship and engages in some secular activities.
Facts:
- Linda LeBoon, an evangelical Christian, was employed as a bookkeeper by the Lancaster Jewish Community Center Association (LJCC) from November 1998 until her termination on August 30, 2002.
- The LJCC's stated mission was to 'enhance and promote Jewish life, identity, and continuity,' and its bylaws provided for local rabbis to serve as non-voting, ex officio members of its Board of Trustees.
- The LJCC's activities included having a mezuzah on its doorway, observing the Sabbath, keeping a kosher kitchen, starting board meetings with Torah readings, and using Hebrew words for donor levels.
- In early 2002, the LJCC was in serious financial trouble and hired Natalie Featherman as its new interim Executive Director.
- LeBoon's relationship with Featherman deteriorated, and LeBoon alleges that in May 2002 she complained to Featherman about the termination of an African-American co-worker, which she believed was racially motivated.
- A few days before her termination, LeBoon attended a 'Jews for Jesus' concert.
- Featherman terminated LeBoon's employment, citing financial pressures and the redundancy of her full-time position.
Procedural Posture:
- Linda LeBoon filed a lawsuit against the Lancaster Jewish Community Center Association (LJCC) in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (court of first instance), alleging religious discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII.
- Both parties consented to have a Magistrate Judge preside over all proceedings.
- The LJCC filed a motion for summary judgment, and LeBoon filed a cross-motion for summary judgment.
- The Magistrate Judge granted summary judgment in favor of the LJCC, finding that it was a religious organization exempt from Title VII's prohibition on religious discrimination.
- LeBoon filed a motion for reconsideration, which led the Magistrate Judge to vacate the initial order and reconsider the case.
- On February 17, 2005, the Magistrate Judge reissued an order, again granting summary judgment to the LJCC on the same grounds.
- The Magistrate Judge denied LeBoon's second motion for reconsideration.
- LeBoon, as appellant, filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, seeking review of the summary judgment granted to the LJCC, the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a community center with a stated mission to 'enhance and promote Jewish life,' which incorporates religious practices, involves religious leaders in an advisory capacity, and receives some funding from religious federations, qualify as a 'religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society' exempt from Title VII's prohibition on religious discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-1(a)?
Opinions:
Majority - Roth, Circuit Judge
Yes. The Lancaster Jewish Community Center qualifies as a religious organization exempt from Title VII because its purpose and character are primarily religious. To determine if an entity is a 'religious organization' under § 702, courts must weigh all significant religious and secular characteristics. The court considered factors such as the LJCC's non-profit status, its stated religious mission, its public identity, the involvement of local rabbis in management, its observance of Jewish holidays and the Sabbath, and the Jewish content of its programs. Although the LJCC engaged in some secular activities, was open to non-Jewish members, and did not strictly adhere to all tenets of Judaism, these factors do not strip it of its primarily religious character. Therefore, the LJCC is entitled to the exemption from Title VII's prohibition on religious discrimination.
Dissenting - Rendell, Circuit Judge
No. The Lancaster Jewish Community Center does not qualify as a 'religious corporation' under § 702(a). The majority's multi-factor test improperly involves the judiciary in evaluating the minutiae of religious practice and ignores congressional intent. The legislative history of Title VII indicates that the § 702(a) exemption was intended only for organizations with 'extremely close ties to organized religions,' meaning those directly funded or controlled by a formal religious body like a synagogue. Because the LJCC was financially and structurally independent—rabbis served only in an advisory, non-voting capacity and most funding came from secular sources like dues and rentals—it does not meet this high standard. The majority's approach creates an unwieldy test that sanctions discrimination beyond what Congress intended to permit.
Analysis:
This decision establishes a flexible, totality-of-the-circumstances test for determining 'religious organization' status under Title VII in the Third Circuit, rejecting a rigid test based on formal control by a house of worship. This broad, functional definition allows organizations that are not traditional churches or synagogues to claim the exemption if their overall mission and activities are 'primarily religious.' The ruling expands the potential scope of the § 702 exemption, giving religiously-affiliated community centers, schools, and social service organizations a stronger basis to claim immunity from religious discrimination lawsuits. The dissent's focus on legislative history highlights the ongoing judicial debate between a functional versus a structural interpretation of this statutory exemption.
