Kymberli Gardner v. CLC of Pascagoula, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
915 F.3d 320 (2019)

ELI5:

Rule of Law:

An employer may be liable for a hostile work environment under Title VII when an employee is harassed by a third party, such as a patient with diminished mental capacity, if the harassment is sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment and the employer knew or should have known of the conduct but failed to take appropriate corrective action.

Facts:

Kymberli Gardner worked as a Certified Nursing Assistant at Plaza Community Living Center, an assisted living facility operated by CLC of Pascagoula.
Gardner was assigned to care for J.S., an elderly resident diagnosed with dementia, a traumatic brain injury, and a personality disorder with aggressive behavior.
J.S. had a documented history of physically and sexually assaulting female staff, including grabbing their breasts and private areas, and making lewd sexual comments.
Gardner experienced daily unwanted physical grabbing and sexual comments from J.S.
Gardner and other employees repeatedly reported J.S.'s behavior to supervisors by documenting it on his chart and making verbal complaints.
When Gardner complained, one supervisor laughed, and an administrator, Teri Reynolds, told her to "put [her] big girl panties on and go back to work."
During one incident, while Gardner was assisting J.S., he attempted to grope her breast and then punched her in the breast three times, causing injuries that required her to miss three months of work.
Following the assault, Gardner refused to care for J.S. and requested reassignment, but her request was denied.

Procedural Posture:

Kymberli Gardner sued her former employer, CLC of Pascagoula, in the U.S. District Court, alleging hostile work environment and retaliation under Title VII.
CLC filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking to have the case dismissed before trial.
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of CLC, concluding that the patient's conduct was not beyond what a person in Gardner's position should expect.
Gardner, as the appellant, appealed the dismissal of her hostile work environment and retaliation claims to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a nursing assistant create a triable issue of fact for a hostile work environment claim under Title VII by presenting evidence of daily physical and verbal sexual harassment by a resident with dementia, which culminated in a physical assault, where the employer was aware of the resident's conduct?

Opinions:

Majority - Gregg Costa, Circuit Judge

Yes. A jury could find that the harassment was sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a hostile work environment, thereby altering the conditions of employment. While the unique circumstances of caring for patients with diminished mental capacity must be considered, it does not create a categorical bar to Title VII liability. The court distinguished this case from prior precedent involving only verbal harassment by noting the persistent and physical nature of the conduct here. The proper legal analysis considers the totality of the circumstances, including the frequency and severity of the conduct, whether it is physically threatening or humiliating, and whether it unreasonably interferes with work performance. In this case, J.S.'s daily groping, violent outbursts, and the physical assault that left Gardner unable to work for three months, combined with the administration's dismissive response, is sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude that a reasonable caregiver would find the work environment hostile and abusive.

Analysis:

This decision clarifies that the special context of a healthcare setting does not immunize employers from Title VII liability for third-party harassment by patients. It establishes that while some level of difficult behavior may be expected, frequent and physically threatening conduct crosses the line into an actionable hostile work environment. The ruling emphasizes that an employer's knowledge of the harassment and its failure to respond appropriately are critical factors. This precedent strengthens protections for healthcare workers and obligates their employers to take complaints about patient-perpetrated harassment seriously, rather than dismissing them as an inevitable part of the job.

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Kymberli Gardner v. CLC of Pascagoula, L.L.C. (2019)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"

Premium Feature