Kroger Co. v. Beck
1978 Ind. App. LEXIS 883, 176 Ind. App. 202, 375 N.E.2d 640 (1978)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A plaintiff may recover damages for mental anguish if they suffer a contemporaneous physical injury, even if that injury is slight and not permanent, as long as a causal connection is established between the physical injury and the subsequent mental distress.
Facts:
- On October 31, 1976, Phyllis Beck purchased a pre-packaged sirloin steak from a Kroger grocery store.
- Later that day, while eating the steak for dinner with her family, Beck felt a sharp pain in the back of her throat.
- She discovered an inch-long piece of a hypodermic needle in the piece of steak she had just placed in her mouth.
- The sharp end of the needle had punctured her throat, causing her to vomit violently.
- Beck administered first aid to herself for a month by gargling.
- Following the incident, Beck developed a fear of eating steak or any other kind of meat.
Procedural Posture:
- Phyllis Beck sued The Kroger Company in the St. Joseph Superior Court, Small Claims Division.
- The trial court found in favor of Beck and awarded her $2700 in damages.
- The Kroger Company, as the appellant, appealed the judgment to the Court of Appeals of Indiana.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Was there sufficient evidence of a contemporaneous physical injury to support the trial court’s award of damages for mental anguish?
Opinions:
Majority - Staton, J.
Yes. A contemporaneous physical injury, even if slight, is sufficient to support an award of damages for resulting mental anguish. The law does not require the physical injury to be permanent or substantial. Beck's uncontradicted testimony established that the needle punctured her throat, which constitutes a physical injury. The key is establishing a causal connection between that physical injury and the resulting mental distress, which the trier of fact found to exist. Kroger's characterization of the injury as a mere 'prick' and its attempt to disconnect it from her subsequent fear are unsupported, as any injury, no matter how slight, can serve as the predicate for recovering damages for the mental anguish it proximately causes.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the 'impact rule' for recovering emotional distress damages, affirming that the prerequisite physical injury does not need to be severe or permanent. By holding that a minor puncture is sufficient, the court lowers the threshold for plaintiffs to bring claims for mental anguish. The ruling emphasizes that the focus of the inquiry should be on the causal link between the physical impact and the psychological harm, rather than on the severity of the initial injury itself. This precedent makes it easier for plaintiffs who suffer minor physical injuries but significant emotional trauma to recover damages.
