Kopp's Company, Inc. v. United States
46 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6018, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12894, 636 F.2d 59 (1980)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, settlement costs and related legal fees incurred by a corporation are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses if the corporation was directly named as a defendant in a tort claim and the claim directly threatened its business operations and financial stability, even if the underlying incident stemmed from an employee's personal use of a company asset.
Facts:
- Kopp's Co., Inc. (the Company) was a Maryland corporation engaged in the lumber and building supply business, solely owned by Earl and Jean Kopp.
- Their son, Wayne, was employed by the Company and had a history of 10 speeding convictions and 3 minor accidents over five years, with his license suspended or revoked, facts known to Earl Kopp.
- On November 17, 1967, while on leave from military service and making personal use of a Company-owned car, Wayne was involved in an accident in Maryland that rendered Warren T. Danner, the driver of the other vehicle, a quadriplegic.
- At the time, the Company and Earl Kopp had automobile liability policies totaling $100,000; Wayne and Jean had no such insurance, and Wayne had no personal assets.
- In 1969, Danner filed a lawsuit seeking $4.2 million in damages against the Company, Earl, Jean, and Wayne Kopp in Maryland.
- The institution of the lawsuit caused the Company's bank to freeze its credit line, major suppliers to express concern, and led to a notation of contingent liability on the Company's financial statements.
- To relieve its financial stress, the Company reached an out-of-court settlement with Danner, agreeing to pay $50,000 (borrowed from its bank) in addition to $102,000 paid by its liability insurer, and incurred $3,068 in legal fees.
Procedural Posture:
- The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) disallowed Kopp's Co., Inc.'s deduction of the $50,000 settlement and $3,068 legal fee as ordinary and necessary business expenses.
- The Company paid the assessed income tax deficiency of $28,935.67, including interest.
- The Company filed for a refund.
- The Company subsequently instituted an action in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (trial court).
- The District Court tried the case non-jury and issued an opinion denying the refund.
- Kopp's Co., Inc. (Appellant) appealed the District Court's judgment.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Are settlement payments and related legal fees incurred by a corporation, which was directly sued for negligent entrustment after its owner's son caused an accident while using a company car for personal reasons, deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code?
Opinions:
Majority - Albert V. Bryan, Senior Circuit Judge
Yes, the settlement payments and related legal fees are deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses. The court reversed the District Court's decision, distinguishing the 'origin of the claim' doctrine established in United States v. Gilmore. While Gilmore disallowed deductions for expenses arising from a purely personal claim (a divorce suit) despite its potential impact on business assets, this case is different because Danner directly named the Company as a party defendant. This direct litigation against the business jeopardized its assets, credit standing, and financial durability. The Company was advised by counsel that it likely would be found liable for negligent entrustment, meaning it faced direct corporate liability, not merely a remote threat from a judgment against Wayne. Therefore, the expenses were incurred to avert direct corporate liability and protect the Company's business operations, aligning with the guidelines for deductibility.
Dissenting - Ervin, Circuit Judge
No, the settlement amounts and legal fees are not deductible as business expenses under § 162(a). The dissent argued for a stricter application of United States v. Gilmore's 'origin and character of the claim' test. The core transaction giving rise to the claim was Earl Kopp's personal act of lending a company car to his son for the son’s personal use. Earl, as an agent of the corporation, was acting outside the scope of his agency in this personal loan. Thus, the Danner claim against the corporation, though direct, stemmed entirely from the familial relationship between father and son, and not from any income-producing activity of the corporation itself. While the company faced a threat to its assets, the 'origin' of that threat was personal, not business-related, making the expenses non-deductible.
Analysis:
This case significantly refines the application of the 'origin of the claim' doctrine, established in United States v. Gilmore, for corporate taxpayers. It clarifies that a direct tort claim alleging corporate negligence (e.g., negligent entrustment), which immediately jeopardizes a corporation's assets and credit, can have a business origin for tax deduction purposes under Section 162(a), even if the precipitating event involved an individual's personal use of a company asset. This ruling distinguishes direct corporate liability from the collateral effects of a personal lawsuit, providing an important precedent for businesses facing similar hybrid claims. It suggests that the direct impact on the corporate entity's viability, rather than solely the initial personal act, can determine deductibility.
