Kohler v. Sheffert
250 Iowa 899, 96 N.W. 2d 911, 1959 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 420 (1959)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A person who assumes control over moving a vehicle and directs the owner's actions in assisting becomes the principal, making them vicariously liable for the owner-agent's negligence. Furthermore, operating a vehicle in violation of a safety statute, such as one requiring adequate brakes, constitutes negligence per se, shifting the burden to the defendant to prove a legal excuse for the violation.
Facts:
- Ellen Conaway's 1941 Ford automobile was non-operational and had been parked unused for several weeks.
- Conaway engaged Joseph Sheffert, a garage operator, to take the car to his garage for inspection and repair.
- Sheffert arrived without a tow truck and decided to 'push start' the car using his own vehicle.
- Sheffert, knowing the car had been idle, did not check its brakes.
- Sheffert instructed the inexperienced Conaway to steer the Ford, control the clutch, and follow his directions while he pushed it from behind.
- After failing to start the car, Sheffert directed Conaway to turn onto West Third Street, a road with a long, steep downgrade.
- Once on the downgrade, the Ford gained momentum, and Conaway discovered for the first time that the brakes were non-functional.
- The out-of-control Ford ran through a stop sign at the bottom of the hill and collided with a vehicle driven by the plaintiff, Kohler.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiff Kohler filed an action for damages against defendants Joseph Sheffert and Ellen Conaway in an Iowa trial court.
- The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for the plaintiff against both defendants, and the court entered a judgment on the verdict.
- Defendant Sheffert moved for a directed verdict and later for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, both of which the trial court overruled.
- Defendant Sheffert, as appellant, appealed the judgment to the Supreme Court of Iowa.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a garage operator who takes control of moving a non-operational vehicle and gives specific instructions to the inexperienced owner for steering become liable as a principal for the owner's resulting negligent acts?
Opinions:
Majority - Oliver, J.
Yes, a garage operator who takes control of moving a non-operational vehicle and gives specific instructions to the inexperienced owner for steering becomes liable as a principal for the owner's resulting negligent acts. The court found that a jury could reasonably determine that an agency relationship existed. Sheffert conceived of and controlled the entire operation of moving the Ford; he gave Conaway, who was inexperienced, specific directions on how to steer and operate the vehicle. Because Sheffert had the right of control and supervision, Conaway was acting as his agent, and her negligence is imputed to him. Additionally, the court affirmed that operating a vehicle without adequate brakes violates Iowa safety statutes and constitutes negligence per se. This creates a prima facie case of negligence, and the burden shifts to the defendant (Sheffert) to provide a legal excuse for the violation, which he failed to do.
Analysis:
This decision solidifies the principle of vicarious liability in the context of independent contractors who direct the actions of vehicle owners. It clarifies that control, not ownership, is the key factor in establishing an agency relationship for a specific task. By holding that a garage operator can become a principal by supervising an owner's assistance, the case expands the scope of liability for professionals who devise and oversee potentially dangerous operations. The ruling also reinforces the strict application of the negligence per se doctrine for vehicle safety violations in Iowa, making it difficult for defendants to escape liability without proving a valid legal excuse for the statutory breach.
