Kober v. Kober

New York Court of Appeals
211 N.E.2d 817, 264 N.Y.S.2d 364, 16 N.Y.2d 191 (1965)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

The fraudulent concealment of morally repugnant, fanatical beliefs that are so fundamental to a person's character as to make the marital relationship unworkable constitutes fraud material to the marriage contract, providing grounds for an annulment.


Facts:

  • Before their marriage, the defendant husband concealed from the plaintiff wife that he had been an officer in the German Army and a member of the Nazi party during World War II.
  • The husband also concealed his fanatical anti-Semitic beliefs, including his approval of Hitler's 'Final Solution,' the extermination of Jewish people.
  • During their courtship, the husband presented himself as having a normal character and an absence of fanatic anti-Semitism.
  • Relying on the husband's apparent character, the wife was unaware of his past and true beliefs when she consented to marry him.
  • The parties married on June 28, 1963.
  • After the marriage, the husband revealed his true beliefs and demanded that the wife cease socializing with all her Jewish friends.
  • The wife asserted she would not have married the husband had she known of his concealed past and beliefs, which she claimed made the marital relationship unworkable.

Procedural Posture:

  • The plaintiff wife sued the defendant husband for an annulment in the New York Special Term, a court of first instance.
  • The plaintiff's initial complaint was dismissed with leave to amend.
  • The plaintiff filed an amended complaint, and the defendant moved to dismiss the second cause of action for insufficiency.
  • The Special Term denied the defendant's motion to dismiss.
  • The defendant husband, as appellant, appealed to the Appellate Division, an intermediate appellate court.
  • The Appellate Division reversed the Special Term's decision and dismissed the cause of action.
  • The plaintiff wife, as appellant, appealed the dismissal to the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a husband's fraudulent concealment of his past as a Nazi officer and his fanatical, genocidal anti-Semitic beliefs constitute fraud material to the marital contract, thereby providing grounds for an annulment?


Opinions:

Majority - Van Voorhis, J.

Yes, the fraudulent concealment of such beliefs constitutes material fraud sufficient for an annulment. Marriage is a civil contract that requires genuine consent, and consent obtained through fraud is not real. The standard for annulment is any fraud that is material to the degree that the deceived party would not have consented to the marriage had they known the truth. The husband's concealed, fanatical conviction for genocide is not merely a political view but evinces a 'diseased mind' that is repugnant and insufferable. Such beliefs are so fundamental to character that their concealment goes to the essence of the marriage contract, making the relationship unworkable and vitiating the plaintiff's consent.


Dissenting - Desmond, C.J., Burke, J., Scileppi, J.

No, the fraudulent concealment of such beliefs does not constitute material fraud sufficient for an annulment. The dissent voted to affirm the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, which had held that the fraud alleged was not vital to the marriage relationship.



Analysis:

This decision significantly broadens the scope of fraud sufficient for a marriage annulment in New York, moving beyond traditional grounds like misrepresentations of finances, health, or prior marital status. It establishes that the fraudulent concealment of one's fundamental character and deeply held, morally repugnant beliefs can be considered 'material' to the marital contract. This precedent allows courts to look at the core moral and philosophical compatibility of the parties as an essential element of the consent to marry, impacting future cases where a spouse's concealed character traits make the marriage unworkable.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Kober v. Kober (1965) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Kober v. Kober