Lexplug logoLexplug

Kirk v. Mercy Hospital Tri-County

Missouri Court of Appeals
8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 522, 851 S.W.2d 617, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 286 (1993)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

An at-will employee has a cause of action for wrongful discharge if they are terminated for acting in accordance with a clear mandate of public policy, which can be found in the purpose and scheme of a statutory or regulatory framework, such as a state's Nursing Practice Act.


Facts:

  • Pauline Kirk was a full-time registered charge nurse at Mercy Hospital Tri-County, supervised by Norma Sellers, the Director of Nursing.
  • A patient, Debbie Crain, was admitted under Kirk's care, and Kirk diagnosed her with toxic shock syndrome, a condition requiring immediate antibiotics.
  • The treating physician did not order the necessary antibiotics, and Kirk's supervisor, Sellers, instructed her to "document, report the facts and stay out of it."
  • Kirk repeatedly expressed concern to Sellers and eventually discussed the patient's condition with the Chief of Medical Staff.
  • Despite subsequent intervention, Debbie Crain died from a massive internal infection.
  • Shortly thereafter, a hospital employee reported to Sellers that Kirk had commented that Crain's physician was "paving her way to heaven."
  • The Hospital Administrator directed Sellers to fire Kirk, which she did.
  • The official service letter stated Kirk was fired for making untrue and detrimental statements that showed a lack of support for the hospital and its staff.

Procedural Posture:

  • Pauline Kirk sued Mercy Hospital Tri-County in the circuit court (trial court), alleging wrongful discharge in violation of public policy.
  • The Hospital filed a Motion for Summary Judgment.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Hospital, finding no clear mandate in law or regulation prohibited the Hospital's actions.
  • Pauline Kirk, as appellant, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Missouri Court of Appeals. The Hospital is the appellee.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does firing an at-will employee nurse for reporting concerns about patient safety, in accordance with duties mandated by the state's Nursing Practice Act, violate the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine?


Opinions:

Majority - Montgomery, Presiding Judge

Yes. Firing a nurse for fulfilling duties mandated by the public policy expressed in the Nursing Practice Act can constitute wrongful discharge. The court reasoned that the trial court erred in concluding that Missouri does not recognize a public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. Citing 'Boyle v. Vista Eyewear, Inc.', the court affirmed that the exception exists and applies when an employee is discharged for refusing to violate the law or a well-established public policy expressed in constitutions, statutes, or regulations. The court found that the Missouri Nursing Practice Act (NPA) and its associated regulations create a clear public policy mandate requiring nurses to act in the best interests of their patients and to ensure they receive safe and competent care. A nurse's failure to act on improper treatment could be considered incompetence or misconduct under the NPA, subjecting them to professional discipline. Therefore, the hospital's instruction to 'stay out of it' was contrary to this public policy, and firing Kirk for acting in accordance with her professional duty could form the basis of a wrongful discharge claim.



Analysis:

This decision solidifies the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine in Missouri, clarifying that such a policy need not be an explicit statutory prohibition on termination. The case establishes that the overall purpose and duties outlined in a professional licensing scheme, like the Nursing Practice Act, can form the basis for a 'clear mandate' of public policy. This precedent empowers employees in regulated professions, especially healthcare, to advocate for patient safety and ethical standards, providing them a legal remedy if they are fired for upholding their professional obligations against an employer's instructions.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Kirk v. Mercy Hospital Tri-County (1993) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Kirk v. Mercy Hospital Tri-County