Kenyon v. Abel
46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 660, 2001 WY 135, 36 P.3d 1161 (2001)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A person who acquires goods through an involuntary transfer from the true owner obtains a void title and cannot convey good title to a subsequent purchaser, even if that purchaser buys the goods in good faith and for value.
Facts:
- Claude Abel inherited a valuable painting by artist Bill Gollings from his late aunt, Rillie Taylor.
- The painting held significant sentimental value for Abel, who intended to keep it.
- While sorting his aunt's belongings, Abel's wife packed the painting into a box marked for delivery to their home.
- During a chaotic process of clearing out the residence, the box containing the painting was mistakenly picked up by the Salvation Army along with items intended for donation.
- The Salvation Army, unaware of the painting's value or origin, priced it at $25.00 in its thrift store.
- Rick Kenyon purchased the painting from the Salvation Army for $25.
- After discovering the painting was missing, Abel traced it to Kenyon and attempted to arrange for its return.
- Kenyon rebuffed Abel's attempts to discuss the painting, leading to the lawsuit.
Procedural Posture:
- Claude Abel filed a lawsuit against Rick Kenyon in a Wyoming district court (the court of first instance).
- Abel's complaint asserted causes of action for replevin and conversion, seeking the return of the painting.
- The district court conducted a bench trial.
- The district court entered a judgment in favor of Abel, ordering the return of the painting.
- Kenyon, as the appellant, appealed the district court's decision to the Supreme Court of Wyoming.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a good faith purchaser for value acquire valid title to property that was inadvertently and involuntarily transferred from the true owner to the seller?
Opinions:
Majority - Hill, Justice
No. A good faith purchaser does not acquire valid title to property if the original owner involuntarily and unintentionally transferred possession of it to the seller. The court's reasoning is grounded in the distinction between void and voidable title under both common law and the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The court first affirmed the trial court's factual finding that Abel had no donative intent to give the painting to the Salvation Army; the transfer was an involuntary mistake. Because the transfer lacked intent, it was not a valid gift. Under common law, the Salvation Army's possession and subsequent sale constituted conversion, which means it had a 'void' title. A party with void title has no title at all and cannot transfer any ownership rights. Similarly, under the UCC, a 'voidable' title—which can be passed to a good faith purchaser—can only arise from a voluntary transfer by the owner, such as a sale induced by fraud. Since Abel's transfer was involuntary, the Salvation Army acquired only a void title. Therefore, it had no power to convey any title to Kenyon, and Kenyon's status as a good faith purchaser is irrelevant.
Analysis:
This decision reaffirms the fundamental distinction between void and voidable title, clarifying that the voluntariness of the initial transfer from the true owner is the determinative factor. It establishes that a good faith purchaser is not protected when the seller's title traces back to an involuntary transfer, such as theft, loss, or mistake. This ruling places the risk of loss on the innocent purchaser rather than the innocent original owner in such circumstances, reinforcing the principle that one cannot sell what one does not own. The case underscores the importance of proving the original owner's intent (or lack thereof) in disputes over ownership of property that has passed through multiple hands.
Unlock the full brief for Kenyon v. Abel