Kennedy v. Mason
10 La. Ann. 519 (1855)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An employee, such as a plantation overseer, is financially liable to their employer for the value of property, including a slave, that is lost due to the employee's negligent, imprudent, or excessively cruel actions that exceed the lawful bounds of their authority.
Facts:
- Warren G. Kennedy worked as an overseer on a plantation owned by the late James W. Mason.
- A slave named Jim Crack ran away from the plantation and was gone for some time.
- On the evening of January 5, 1852, during extremely cold weather, Jim Crack was captured and returned to the plantation.
- Kennedy ordered Jim Crack to be stripped, tied down on the cold ground, and beaten with a hand-saw and whip.
- The beating continued with short intermissions for at least an hour and a half.
- Following the punishment, Jim Crack was unsteady, staggered, and fell when unsupported.
- He was then taken to his cabin and was found dead in his bed approximately four hours later.
- A post-mortem examination concluded that death was likely caused by a combination of the whipping, the slave's exposure to the cold, and a "congestive chill."
Procedural Posture:
- Warren G. Kennedy (plaintiff) sued the estate of J. W. Mason (defendant) in a Louisiana District Court (trial court) to recover $600 in unpaid salary.
- The defendant filed a plea in reconvention (a counterclaim), seeking to offset the salary with the value of a slave who died, allegedly due to the plaintiff's actions.
- The District Court entered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Kennedy.
- The defendant, the estate of J. W. Mason, appealed the decision to the reviewing appellate court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Is a plantation overseer liable to the slave's owner for the value of a slave who dies as a result of excessive and imprudent punishment inflicted by the overseer?
Opinions:
Majority - Voorhies, J.
Yes. An overseer is liable for the value of a slave whose death results from the overseer's improper and imprudent treatment. The court reasoned that the slave's death was caused by the combination of the severe punishment and the exposure to the cold weather. This conduct constituted gross negligence, especially Kennedy's failure to provide care for the slave after the beating. Under Louisiana Civil Code Art. 2295, a person is responsible for damage caused by their negligence or imprudence. While a master could legally punish a slave, the law (Civil Code Art. 173) prohibited punishment of "unusual rigor" or any punishment that would expose the slave to loss of life. Citing Hendricks v. Phillips, the court affirmed that an overseer is restricted by the same limits as the owner and is liable to the employer for damages when those limits are transgressed. Kennedy's actions were deemed "excessive and cruel" and therefore he was financially responsible for the resulting loss.
Analysis:
This case applies general principles of agency and tort law to the master-slave relationship, treating the slave as property for which an agent (the overseer) owes a duty of care to the principal (the owner). It establishes that an employee's delegated authority is not absolute and that exceeding legal or reasonable bounds can result in personal financial liability to the employer for any resulting property loss. The decision reinforces that an agent is liable for damages caused by their negligence, imprudence, or breach of duty, thereby protecting the property interests of the principal from the agent's misconduct.
Unlock the full brief for Kennedy v. Mason