Lexplug logoLexplug

Kaycee Land and Livestock v. Flahive

Wyoming Supreme Court
46 P.3d 323, 2002 Wyo. LEXIS 78, 2002 WY 73 (2002)
ELI5:

Rule of Law:

The equitable doctrine of piercing the corporate veil applies to Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) in the same manner it applies to corporations. A court may disregard the LLC's limited liability protection to hold a member personally liable, even in the absence of fraud, if failing to do so would promote injustice or fundamental unfairness.


Facts:

  • Kaycee Land and Livestock (Kaycee) entered into a contract with Flahive Oil & Gas, LLC (Flahive LLC) for the use of the surface of Kaycee's real property.
  • Roger Flahive was the managing member of Flahive LLC at all relevant times.
  • Kaycee alleges that Flahive LLC caused environmental contamination to its property.
  • Flahive LLC currently has no assets.
  • There is no allegation of fraud by any party in this matter.

Procedural Posture:

  • Kaycee Land and Livestock sued Flahive Oil & Gas, LLC and Roger Flahive individually in a Wyoming district court for alleged environmental contamination.
  • In the district court proceedings, Kaycee sought to pierce the LLC veil to hold Roger Flahive personally liable for the LLC's alleged actions.
  • The district court certified a question of law to the Wyoming Supreme Court to determine if piercing the veil is a valid legal remedy against a Wyoming LLC.

Locked

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Is a claim to pierce the limited liability entity veil an available remedy against a Wyoming Limited Liability Company under the Wyoming Limited Liability Company Act, in the absence of fraud?


Opinions:

Majority - Kite, Justice

Yes. The equitable remedy of piercing the veil is an available remedy under the Wyoming Limited Liability Company Act. The doctrine, which allows a court to disregard a company's separate legal status, is a judicially created, common-law remedy intended to prevent injustice. The court reasoned that the legislative silence in the Wyoming LLC Act on this issue does not abrogate this well-established common law doctrine. The court held there is no reason in law or policy to treat LLCs differently than corporations, as both are created by statute to limit investor liability. If the members of an LLC fail to treat it as a separate entity, they should not be permitted to use the legal fiction of the company to escape individual liability for acts that damage third parties. Furthermore, the court reiterated its precedent that fraud is not a prerequisite to piercing the veil; it is sufficient that recognizing the entity's separate existence would 'promote injustice.'



Analysis:

This decision establishes a significant precedent in Wyoming, a pioneering state for LLCs, by formally extending the common-law doctrine of piercing the corporate veil to this business form. The court's holding clarifies that legislative silence on the matter does not create an impenetrable shield of liability for LLC members. By affirming that fraud is not a prerequisite and that promoting injustice is sufficient grounds, the court ensures that the veil-piercing analysis remains a flexible, equitable, and fact-intensive inquiry, preventing the LLC structure from being used to unfairly avoid liability.

🤖 Gunnerbot:
Query Kaycee Land and Livestock v. Flahive (2002) directly. You can ask questions about any aspect of the case. If it's in the case, Gunnerbot will know.
Locked
Subscribe to Lexplug to chat with the Gunnerbot about this case.

Unlock the full brief for Kaycee Land and Livestock v. Flahive