Kass v. Young
136 Cal. Rptr. 469, 67 Cal. App. 3d 100, 1977 Cal. App. LEXIS 1208 (1977)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A trial court lacks jurisdiction to enter a default judgment on behalf of a putative class until it has first determined the action is suitable for class treatment, certified the class, and provided for notice to the absent class members.
Facts:
- On March 31, 1973, Steven Kass was one of approximately 14,000 patrons attending a concert at the Oakland Coliseum.
- The concert's star performer was Neil Young.
- During the performance, Young abruptly walked off the stage, terminating the concert earlier than expected.
- Kass alleged that because of the early termination, he and the other 14,000 ticket purchasers did not receive the full concert performance for which they had paid.
Procedural Posture:
- Steven Kass sued Neil Young in a California superior court (trial court), filing a class action on behalf of himself and all other concert attendees.
- Young was personally served with the summons and complaint but did not respond.
- A clerk entered a default against Young.
- After a hearing, the trial court entered a default judgment against Young, awarding $91,000 to the class.
- Young filed a motion to vacate both the default and the default judgment.
- The trial court vacated the default judgment and the default as it pertained to the class, but allowed the default to remain against Young in his individual capacity.
- Kass appealed the order vacating the class action judgment, and Young cross-appealed the order maintaining his individual default, bringing the case before the California Court of Appeal.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a trial court have jurisdiction to enter a default judgment in a purported class action before the class has been certified and notice has been given to the putative class members?
Opinions:
Majority - Devine, J.
No. A court exceeds its jurisdiction by entering a class-wide default judgment without first certifying the class and providing for notice to its members. The mandatory procedures for class certification and notice are jurisdictional prerequisites that cannot be waived by a defendant's default. These procedures are essential not only to protect the defendant from multiple future lawsuits but, more importantly, to protect the due process rights of the absent, unnamed class members who would be bound by the judgment. A defendant's failure to answer does not relieve the court of its independent duty to determine if the class is appropriate, ensure proper notice is given, and confirm that the class action serves the interests of the litigants and the judiciary. Therefore, while Young's default stands as an admission of the complaint's allegations against him individually, the class-wide judgment entered without certification and notice is void.
Analysis:
This case establishes that the procedural requirements for a class action—certification and notice—are jurisdictional in nature and cannot be bypassed even when a defendant defaults. It underscores the court's role as a guardian for absent class members, whose rights could be compromised without these protections. The ruling prevents a single representative plaintiff from obtaining a binding judgment on behalf of thousands of unwilling or unaware individuals. It solidifies the principle that a class action is not merely a procedural device for convenience but a formal process with constitutional due process implications that the court must actively manage, irrespective of the defendant's participation.
