Josephine Banks v. United States
267 F. 2d 535, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3814 (1959)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A person stands in loco parentis to another for the purposes of the National Life Insurance Act if they intend to assume a parental role, as evidenced by their acts and conduct. This relationship is not dependent on the provision of financial support or the age of the parties, and can exist between two adults.
Facts:
- In 1937, Mrs. Banks, an older woman, became acquainted with Edward J. Alexander, a 28-year-old musician who was estranged from his wife.
- Alexander frequently visited Banks's home for coffee and meals, and in return, he performed chores like mopping and running errands.
- Banks provided care for Alexander by doing his laundry, giving him clothes, admonishing him about excessive drinking, and allowing him to rest in her apartment before work.
- After Alexander was inducted into military service in 1943, he and Banks corresponded, exchanged pictures, and he listed her as his emergency addressee.
- Alexander took out a $10,000 National Service Life Insurance policy, initially naming his sister as the beneficiary.
- In March 1945, Alexander formally changed the beneficiary of his insurance policy to Mrs. Banks, identifying her relationship as 'Parent (Loco-Parentis).'
- Alexander died in service on October 18, 1945.
- Government agencies were unable to locate any of Alexander's relatives, including his estranged wife or sister.
Procedural Posture:
- Mrs. Banks (plaintiff) filed an action in the U.S. District Court (trial court) against the United States to recover the proceeds of Edward Alexander's life insurance policy.
- The District Court, after a trial, found that Banks had stood in loco parentis to the insured and was therefore qualified to be the beneficiary.
- The District Court entered a judgment in favor of Banks.
- The United States (appellant) appealed the District Court's judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, with Banks as the appellee.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a person stand in loco parentis to an insured serviceman for purposes of the National Life Insurance Act when they did not provide financial support and the relationship began when the serviceman was an adult?
Opinions:
Majority - Mathes, District Judge
Yes. A person can stand in loco parentis to an insured serviceman without providing financial support and even if the relationship is with another adult. The court rejected a strict common-law definition of in loco parentis that would require financial responsibility. Instead, it held that the relationship is primarily a question of intention, which must be demonstrated through objective manifestations such as the parties' acts, conduct, and declarations. The court reasoned that financial support is only one of many possible manifestations of a parental relationship and that one can provide more than just material things, such as guidance, care, and emotional support. Citing Zazove v. United States, the court also found that the adult status of the insured is immaterial, as the duty of support ceases at the age of majority anyway, and non-financial parental relationships can certainly exist between adults. This interpretation aligns with the public policy of encouraging family relationships, including foster ones.
Analysis:
This decision significantly broadens the definition of 'in loco parentis' under federal law, moving away from a rigid, common-law interpretation requiring financial support. It establishes that the determinative factor is the intent of the parties to form a parent-child type of relationship, which can be evidenced by non-monetary acts of care and affection. This precedent ensures that the intended beneficiaries of service members are recognized, even in non-traditional family structures. Future cases involving similar claims will focus on the qualitative nature and mutual intent of the relationship, rather than on a checklist of traditional parental duties like financial support.
