Joseph Stephens & Co., Inc. v. Cikanek
588 F. Supp. 2d 870, 67 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 384, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98900 (2008)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Revised Article 9, a depository bank that maintains a debtor's account automatically perfects its security interest in that account by 'control,' and this perfected security interest has priority over a subsequent judgment lien obtained by a third-party creditor.
Facts:
- Joseph Stevens & Company, Inc. (JSC), a brokerage firm, maintained a deposit account with Citibank in New York.
- On February 8, 2007, JSC entered into a standby letter of credit agreement with Citibank for the benefit of JSC's landlord.
- To secure this letter of credit, JSC executed a Security Agreement, identifying its Citibank deposit account as collateral, which was finalized on February 20, 2007.
- The agreements between JSC and Citibank stipulated that New York law would govern their relationship and any disputes.
- A separate financial dispute arose between David Cikanek and JSC, leading to an arbitration proceeding.
- JSC subsequently ceased its operations as a brokerage firm.
Procedural Posture:
- David Cikanek obtained an arbitration award against Joseph Stevens & Company, Inc. (JSC).
- The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois confirmed the arbitration award.
- On July 21, 2008, the district court entered a final money judgment of $238,519 in favor of Cikanek and against JSC.
- Cikanek initiated supplemental proceedings to enforce the judgment and issued a citation to discover assets to third-party Citibank on July 23, 2008.
- Citibank responded to the citation, identifying a New York deposit account held by JSC containing $82,688.19.
- Cikanek then filed a petition with the district court for a turnover order to compel Citibank to release the funds from JSC's account.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a depository bank's perfected security interest in a debtor's deposit account, established as collateral for a letter of credit, have priority over a subsequent judgment lien obtained by a third-party creditor against the same account?
Opinions:
Majority - Amy J. St. Eve
Yes. A depository bank's security interest perfected by control has priority over a subsequent judgment lien creditor. Under the UCC's choice-of-law provisions, New York law governs the priority of the security interest because the agreements between Citibank and JSC expressly chose New York law. According to New York's UCC § 9-104, a bank with which a deposit account is maintained automatically has 'control' over that account. This control serves to perfect the bank's security interest under § 9-314. Here, Citibank's security interest attached and was perfected on February 20, 2007, when the security agreement was finalized. Because this perfection occurred well before Cikanek obtained his judgment lien in July 2008, Citibank's interest is superior. The UCC grants this priority to depository banks to enable them to extend credit without needing to check public records for competing interests, thereby promoting stability in the payment system.
Analysis:
This case provides a clear application of the special rules for deposit accounts under UCC Revised Article 9, affirming the 'super-priority' status of a depository bank's security interest. The decision reinforces that perfection by 'control' is automatic for the bank maintaining the account, a powerful protection that subordinates most other creditors, including subsequent lien creditors. This outcome solidifies the principle that all potential creditors are on constructive notice that a debtor's bank account may be encumbered by the bank itself, thereby protecting the bank's ability to lend against deposits and ensuring the smooth functioning of the payment system.
Unlock the full brief for Joseph Stephens & Co., Inc. v. Cikanek