JMB Properties Urban Co. v. Paolucci
604 N.E.2d 967 (1992)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A tenant waives a claim of constructive eviction by failing to abandon the premises within a reasonable time after the rise of an untenantable condition.
Facts:
- In 1978, Alfred Paolucci opened a jewelry store in the Louis Joliet Mall.
- In November 1984, Barretts Audio and Video Store moved in next to Paolucci's store.
- Beginning in December 1984, Paolucci began complaining to the mall's landlord about excessive noise from Barretts that allegedly caused vibrations and disrupted business.
- In September 1985, Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership XIV purchased the mall, and J M B Properties Urban Company (JMB) began managing it.
- In August 1986, nearly two years after the noise issues began, Paolucci entered into a new six-year lease with Carlyle.
- Paolucci continued to complain about the noise from Barretts periodically until Barretts vacated the mall in February 1990.
- Paolucci failed to pay rent for July 1990 and vacated the premises in August 1990, two years before his lease was set to expire.
Procedural Posture:
- Plaintiffs JMB and Carlyle sued defendant Alfred Paolucci in a state trial court for unpaid rent and damages for breach of a commercial lease.
- Defendant Paolucci filed a counterclaim, alleging he was constructively evicted.
- Following a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of the defendant, holding that he had been constructively evicted.
- The trial court awarded the plaintiffs rent only for the two months the defendant occupied the premises without payment.
- Plaintiffs, JMB and Carlyle, as appellants, appealed the trial court's judgment to the intermediate appellate court.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a commercial tenant waive a claim of constructive eviction by remaining on the premises for nearly five years after an allegedly untenantable noise condition began, renewing the lease during that period, and only vacating six months after the noise-producing neighbor had left?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Slater
Yes. A tenant waives a claim of constructive eviction by failing to abandon the premises within a reasonable time. The court held that the defendant's delay was unreasonable as a matter of law. To claim constructive eviction, a tenant must surrender the property within a reasonable time after the untenantable condition arises. Here, Paolucci tolerated the alleged noise for nearly five years, renewed his lease in the midst of the problem, and then waited an additional six months to vacate after the source of the noise had already left. The court found that this extended delay, coupled with the act of renewing the lease, constituted a waiver of any constructive eviction claim, distinguishing this case from others where tenants vacated within a few months.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies the temporal element of a constructive eviction claim, emphasizing that it is not a right a tenant can hold in reserve indefinitely. The court establishes that a multi-year delay, especially when combined with actions affirming the tenancy like signing a new lease, is unreasonable and results in a waiver of the claim. This precedent strengthens the position of landlords against tenants who tolerate a condition for a long period before using it as a pretext to terminate a lease, requiring tenants to act promptly by vacating if they believe the premises have become untenantable.
