Jeffrey Towers, Inc. v. Twin Towers, Inc.
291 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1968 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1408, 57 Misc. 2d 46 (1968)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
A mortgage can secure the performance of specific, non-monetary obligations (unliquidated promises) in addition to a monetary debt. A mortgagor who pays the full monetary debt is not entitled to a full discharge of the mortgage if such enforceable non-monetary obligations remain unfulfilled.
Facts:
- Irma Straus and Lillian Romm sold approximately five acres of land to Twin Towers, Inc. (petitioner's predecessor) while retaining an adjacent eight-acre parcel.
- As part of the sale, Twin Towers gave Straus and Romm a purchase-money mortgage on the five-acre parcel.
- In addition to securing a monetary debt, a rider to the mortgage required the mortgagor to perform several acts for the benefit of Straus and Romm's retained land.
- These required acts included installing a sewer main and constructing an 'alternate driveway' across the mortgaged property to service the retained parcel by specific dates.
- The agreement also contained a promise for the mortgagor to consent to any future zoning applications made by Straus and Romm for their parcel.
- The petitioner, Jeffrey Towers, Inc., as the new owner, sought to prepay the entire outstanding monetary debt.
- Straus and Romm refused to provide a full satisfaction and discharge of the mortgage upon payment, asserting that the sewer and driveway obligations had not yet been fulfilled.
Procedural Posture:
- Jeffrey Towers, Inc., filed a petition in the New York Supreme Court, Westchester County (a trial-level court), to compel Irma Straus and Lillian Romm to satisfy and discharge a mortgage upon tender of the outstanding monetary balance.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does a mortgagor's payment of the full monetary debt secured by a mortgage entitle the mortgagor to a full and final discharge of that mortgage when the mortgage agreement also explicitly secures the performance of other unfulfilled, non-monetary obligations?
Opinions:
Majority - Gagliardi, J.
No, a mortgagor's payment of the full monetary debt does not entitle them to a full discharge if the mortgage also secures other enforceable, unfulfilled, non-monetary obligations. A mortgage is a conveyance of land intended as security not only for the payment of money but also for 'the doing of some prescribed act.' The court found that the promises to build a sewer and a driveway were valid, enforceable obligations secured by the mortgage. It reasoned that the driveway obligation was not terminated merely by a 'paper' declaration of a public street; the street had to be actually improved and serviceable to fulfill the parties' intent. While the petitioner could pay the monetary debt to stop interest from accruing and receive a certificate to that effect, the mortgage itself would remain on the property as security for the completion of the driveway and sewer. However, the court found the promise to consent to zoning applications too speculative in value to be enforced as a mortgage lien.
Analysis:
This decision clarifies that a mortgage's scope can extend beyond simple monetary debts to include specific, non-monetary performance obligations. It establishes that courts will enforce these 'unliquidated' promises so long as they are not overly speculative and their purpose is clearly defined within the mortgage instrument. The ruling distinguishes between tangible obligations (like construction), which can be valued and secured, and intangible ones (like consenting to a zoning application), which may be too speculative to enforce through a mortgage lien. This impacts real estate transactions by validating the use of mortgages as a tool to ensure the completion of related development promises, while also setting a limit on the enforceability of purely speculative covenants.
