Jannusch v. Naffziger
883 N.E.2d 711 (2008)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), a contract for the sale of goods can be formed through the parties' conduct, even if some terms are left open, as long as the parties intended to make a contract and there is a reasonably certain basis for giving an appropriate remedy.
Facts:
- Gene and Martha Jannusch operated a mobile concession business called Festival Foods.
- Lindsey and Louann Naffziger expressed interest in purchasing the business and met with the Jannusches several times.
- On August 13, 2005, the parties met, and the Jannusches contended that an oral agreement was made to sell Festival Foods to the Naffzigers for $150,000.
- The Naffzigers paid the Jannusches $10,000 immediately.
- The day after the payment, the Naffzigers took possession of the Festival Foods truck, trailer, and all associated equipment.
- The Naffzigers operated the business for the remainder of the 2005 season, earning all income, purchasing inventory, replacing equipment, paying employees, and paying taxes on the business.
- At the first two events, Gene Jannusch assisted the Naffzigers, who paid him an hourly wage and covered his lodging.
- Two days after the concession season ended, the Naffzigers returned the business assets to the storage facility where the Jannusches had previously kept them, stating the income was lower than expected.
Procedural Posture:
- Gene and Martha Jannusch sued Lindsey and Louann Naffziger in an Illinois trial court for breach of an oral contract.
- Following a bench trial, the trial court found in favor of the defendants, the Naffzigers.
- The plaintiffs, the Jannusches, appealed the trial court's judgment to the Appellate Court of Illinois.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does the conduct of the parties, including partial payment, taking possession of a business's assets, and operating the business for a season, create an enforceable oral contract for the sale of goods under the UCC, despite the absence of a formal written agreement and some missing non-essential terms?
Opinions:
Majority - Justice Cook
Yes, the conduct of the parties created an enforceable oral contract. Under UCC § 2-204, a contract for the sale of goods may be made in any manner sufficient to show agreement, including conduct by both parties which recognizes the existence of such a contract. Here, the transaction was predominantly for the sale of goods (truck, trailer, equipment), so the UCC applies. The Statute of Frauds was satisfied by the partial performance exception, as the Naffzigers made a $10,000 payment which was accepted, and they received and accepted the goods by taking possession and operating the business for a full season. The essential terms—price ($150,000) and the subject matter (Festival Foods' assets)—were agreed upon. The Naffzigers' conduct, such as paying taxes, replacing equipment, and retaining all income, was inconsistent with the idea that they were merely 'pursuing buying the business.' The anticipation of a formal written document did not prevent the formation of a contract, and returning the goods at the end of the season constituted a breach of that contract, not a rejection of an offer.
Analysis:
This decision reaffirms the UCC's flexible approach to contract formation, emphasizing that the parties' conduct is a primary indicator of their intent to be bound. It demonstrates that for a contract to be enforceable, not every term must be finalized, as long as the essential terms are agreed upon and there is a clear basis for a remedy. The case serves as a significant precedent for oral agreements involving mixed goods and services, showing that courts will look to the substance of the parties' actions over formalities. It illustrates that a party cannot accept goods, use them for their own benefit for a substantial period, and then attempt to unwind the transaction by claiming no contract was ever formed, especially when their dissatisfaction stems from the profitability of the venture.
