Jackson v. McNeal

Louisiana Court of Appeal
180 So. 3d 376 (2015)

ELI5:

Rule of Law:

A putative father's petition for custody that includes factual allegations of his paternity is sufficient to state an action to establish filiation. So long as the facts are alleged and proven by a preponderance of the evidence, a court may grant relief, including a finding of paternity, even if not explicitly demanded in the pleadings.

Facts:

Robert Lee Jackson and LaQuinta McNeal were in a romantic relationship and lived together.
On November 2, 2012, McNeal gave birth to a child, who was named Robert Lee Jackson, Jr.
Jackson, McNeal, and the child lived together as a family after the child was born.
In February 2014, Jackson and McNeal ended their cohabitation.
Following the separation, McNeal moved to another state with the child.

Procedural Posture:

Robert Lee Jackson filed a petition against LaQuinta McNeal in a trial court seeking custody of their minor child.
McNeal was served but did not attend the custody hearing, and no attorney appeared on her behalf.
The trial court heard testimony only from Jackson and entered a judgment awarding the parties joint custody, designating Jackson as the domiciliary parent and referring to him as 'Father.'
McNeal unsuccessfully attempted to have the judgment vacated.
McNeal, as appellant, filed an appeal to the intermediate appellate court, arguing the trial court applied the incorrect burden of proof. Jackson is the appellee.

Premium Content

Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief

You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture

Issue:

Does a putative father's petition for custody that alleges factual paternity, but does not formally request a judgment of filiation, sufficiently raise the issue of paternity so that he is treated as a parent, rather than a non-parent, for the purposes of determining the applicable burden of proof in the custody proceeding?

Opinions:

Majority - Crain, J.

No. A putative father's petition for custody that factually alleges paternity is sufficient to raise the issue of filiation, thereby allowing him to be treated as a parent for purposes of determining the burden of proof. Citing Louisiana's fact-pleading standard and precedents like Miller v. Thibeaux and Udomeh v. Joseph, the court found that bare allegations of paternity within a petition provide fair notice to the defendant that filiation is at issue. Jackson's petition referred to the child as 'his son' and the 'minor child' of 'the parties.' In the context of a custody proceeding, these allegations could serve no other purpose than to assert paternity. Therefore, McNeal had adequate notice. The court also found that Jackson's uncontroverted testimony about cohabiting with McNeal and the child being named 'Jr.' was sufficient to prove paternity by a preponderance of the evidence. Consequently, the higher burden of proof for non-parents under Louisiana Civil Code article 133, which requires a showing of substantial harm, was inapplicable.

Concurring - Holdridge, J.

Yes. While agreeing with the majority's reasoning and conclusion, this opinion suggests that the trial court's judgment should be amended to expressly declare Robert Lee Jackson to be the biological father of the minor child. An explicit declaration would unambiguously provide the judgment of paternity that the majority concludes he is entitled to, preventing any future confusion on the matter.

Analysis:

This case clarifies that under Louisiana's fact-pleading system, substance prevails over form, particularly in family law matters. It lowers a significant procedural barrier for unmarried fathers by allowing them to establish paternity within a custody proceeding, rather than requiring a separate avowal action. The decision extends the 'fair notice' pleading principle from wrongful death cases (Udomeh, Miller) to child custody disputes, promoting judicial efficiency and ensuring parental rights are adjudicated based on factual allegations rather than technical pleading labels.

Gunnerbot

AI-powered case assistant

Loaded: Jackson v. McNeal (2015)

Try: "What was the holding?" or "Explain the dissent"