Island Creek Coal Co. v. Rodgers
77 Oil & Gas Rep. 261, 1982 Ky. App. LEXIS 276, 644 S.W.2d 339 (1982)
Premium Feature
Subscribe to Lexplug to listen to the Case Podcast.
Rule of Law:
An underground mine operator is held strictly liable for damages from subsidence, and its absolute duty to support the surface in its 'natural state' is defined by the condition of the surface, including reasonable and foreseeable improvements, at the time mining operations cease, not at the time the mineral rights were originally severed.
Facts:
- In 1905, the mineral rights under a tract of rural land were severed from the surface rights.
- Island Creek Coal Company's predecessor conducted underground mining on the land, with operations lasting from 1948 until 1963, and the mines were formally abandoned in 1971.
- In 1966, Jewell and Elsie Rodgers constructed their home in the Sharp Subdivision, which was situated on the surface directly above the abandoned mines.
- Cimarron Coal Corporation began strip mining operations on adjacent property, utilizing large quantities of explosives.
- On April 29, 1977, the Rodgerses experienced a significant, earthquake-like blast and subsequently discovered their home had sustained damage.
- Experts for the Rodgerses and Cimarron provided testimony that Island Creek had left insufficient pillar support in the abandoned underground mines.
- Cimarron continued its blasting activities after the Rodgerses personally complained and other residents presented a petition against the blasting.
Procedural Posture:
- Jewell and Elsie Rodgers sued Island Creek Coal Company and Cimarron Coal Corporation in the Hopkins Circuit Court, a Kentucky state trial court.
- A jury returned a verdict for the Rodgerses, awarding $50,000 in compensatory damages and apportioning fault at 50% to Island Creek and 50% to Cimarron.
- The jury also assessed $45,000 in punitive damages against Cimarron Coal Corporation alone.
- Island Creek and Cimarron, as appellants, separately appealed the adverse judgments to the Kentucky Court of Appeals.
Premium Content
Subscribe to Lexplug to view the complete brief
You're viewing a preview with Rule of Law, Facts, and Procedural Posture
Issue:
Does an underground mining company's absolute duty to support the surface in its 'natural state' refer to the land's condition at the time of the original mineral severance, or to the land's condition, including foreseeable developments, at the time its mining operations concluded?
Opinions:
Majority - McDonald, J.
No. The duty to support the surface in its 'natural state' is not fixed to the condition of the land at the time of the original mineral rights severance. The court defines 'natural state' as the condition of the surface, including reasonable and foreseeable improvements thereon, at the time the coal is severed from the earth, which is when mining operations cease. The court reasoned that Kentucky common law imposes absolute and strict liability on underground mine operators for subsidence damage, a duty not dependent on negligence. This liability extends to foreseeable developments that exist when mining concludes (in this case, 1963), by which time a modern residential subdivision was a reasonable and foreseeable use of the surface.
Analysis:
This decision significantly clarifies the temporal scope of the common law duty of subjacent support in mining law. By rejecting the historical 'time of severance' rule, the court adapted a traditional legal doctrine to modern development patterns, holding mining companies accountable for the foreseeable evolution of the surface land. This precedent shifts the economic risk of subsidence damage for subsequent surface improvements onto the mineral estate owner, potentially increasing liability for historical mining operations. The ruling ensures that the duty of support is not a static concept frozen at the time of an ancient deed, but a dynamic obligation that reflects the reasonable use of the surface when mining actually occurs.
Unlock the full brief for Island Creek Coal Co. v. Rodgers